BenLaw said:
Tbf I was inferring no 'blame' on Asher's part, he lacks all moral culpability at his age. Although a *lot* of things are his fault
I watched Berberian about a month ago. I think I'd built it up in my mind too much and was ultimately underwhelmed. Toby Jones was excellent, as ever, as was most of the supporting cast. It was very atmospheric and claustrophobic and was a subject matter j found interesting, as I would expect for many 'cinephiles'. I just felt it lacked variety in tone and pace and the atmosphere never really culminated in anything. I expected some sort of psychological revelation (or a 'twist') which I never felt appeared. Having said that, I didn't really get the slightly hallucinatory bit towards the end. If that had any deeper meaning than 'the situation's sending him a bit crazy' then maybe the whole crux of the film was lost on me. Anyway, a four star film, just not the 5 I was kind of expecting.
I really liked Berberian, though I've only watched it once and that was about a month ago. I was convinced I'd figured it all out as I fell asleep, but I concluded that another viewing was needed to verify (or challenge) my initial interpretation. I've also forgotten half of the thoughts buzzing round my head late that night.
From what I recall, I thought it was film about proximity to work and the obsessive nature of creative process, while also a meditation on media effects. As the film progresses, the boundaries between Gilderoy's world and the film he's working on increasingly overlap. (While initially discrete, "real" and fantasy worlds start to bleed into one-another and become increasingly confused. Tthe boundary between "reality" and fantasy worlds dissolves in the final shot, when Gilderoy disappears into the cinema screen.)
Gilderoy also starts the film a bashful, sensitive man, disturbed by the film's subject matter and violent content. Yet as the narrative continues he becomes desensitised, emotionally blunted, and ultimately violent, re-enacting the material he's been repeatedly viewing.
As I say, I need to watch it again with that interpretive framework in mind, in an effort to pick up on further cues and details. My interpretation might change entirely...
Glad you liked it anyway, even if you were a little underwhelmed. I thought it was certainly one of the best films I've seen recently; and I'm glad less conventional, abstract cinema is still produced in relatively mainstream contexts.
Anyway, this has nothing to do with Panasonic TVs. I probably should have started another thread.