CJSF
New member
busb said:CJSF said:busb said:drummerman said:CJSF said:stevebrock said:Been to listen to a Sugden A21 today - well somewhat dissapointed with presentation - I don't know if its my thing or not, found it a little duller than the Elicit R, Speakers were PMC GB1. I guess you could listen to it for hours and hours, think I would get bored though.
A small point, one of the good things about full set valve amps, 'change the valves to give you the sound you like' . . . something I am in the process of doing at the moment, getting a lot out of the 'speakers' by matching the valves to their strong points. I'm finding the bias setting can also change the presentation (bias setting kept with in the limits of the manufacturers recommendations). On my ST40, the less the bias, the warmer/smoother the sound becomes, but still retaining the drive and dynamics or feeling, sensitivity on the recording that the artist intended? 'Adding what is not there' seems to defeat the object at this level . . . :?
CJSF
Mmmh, double edged sword that one. Not unlike switchable digital filters on DAC's, valve rolling, bias tweaking etc. can lead to endless tweaking ending in more confusion than musical satisfaction.
Kinda better to accept that all recordings/media are not equal and just enjoy them for what they are ...
regards
Spot on in my opinion! Although my M-DAC has several filter options, I stick to just one - otherwise I'll start worrying if certain recordings suit another setting rather than enjoying music. It's a bit like computing, I've stopped fiddling & just use the damn thing. Life's too short for endless tweaking, chopping & changing stuff.
Mmm . . . I dont disagree, however when I look at what I have invested in hifi, I want the best value out of it, 110% . . . are you satisfied with second best?
So, being the hands on type, its no hassle for me, I like to know how things works, in the case of valve rolling, its an intangible, but a satisfaction to sit back and enjoy the music, just like I'm doing at this very moment as I type . . . close field listening, source; Spotify, artist; Stefan Grossman 'Shining Shadows',
I keep saying it, the trick is knowing when to stop and enjoy the music, its the reward for the frustrations of tweaking
CJSF
Part of my job entails repairing electronics. Most of the time it's straightforward enough but occasionally the fault is stubborn: do I spend another 30' investigating down to component level or cut my losses & fit a new assembly? Professional pride tells me to spend more time but common sense tells me to ignore my ego & fit a new module/PCB.
I also want to get the best return on investment with my system but good music does not require endless fettling - my Hi Fi is just the means. I do experiment with stuff like speaker & listening position tweaking but I stop & leave well alone for months on end.
Back in the 70s, a friend would have something new (to him, often 2nd hand) every time I visited, be it a NyTech receiver, new speakers or stands or whatever. This was a defining moment for me when I realised that for some, the means was more important than the end. Great music sounds great & hence enjoyable out of a radio, listening on my system only ices that cake, it does not transform the music I don't like into something I do! We collectively need to realise that HiFi can develope into an OCDlike persuit. Knowing when to stop is not always clear cut.
Even with a stable system & demeanor, stripping down, vacuuming then checking wiring is worthwhile once a year.
Back in the 80's 'busb', I made my living from evaluating hifi SQ and improving it passively. I new and know when to stop, but I enjoy fiddling, be it hifi, or in other hobbies which are/were even more minute in there 'fiddleology options', we are talking to the levels that you will find in F1 racing these days. One has to say, my time is cheap these days being retired, and I dont go into the detail I used to.
I sort of agree, bad music cannot be made good by putting it through a good system. However I have a few recording that have become favorites from my to large a 'duff pile', as the improving system has revealed inner qualities of the recording, one notable is Paul Simon's 'Grace lands'. Equally, I have enjoyed records that the improving system has ripped apart . . . reveling limitations in the recording . . . Bad music is still bad music.
The whole thing is a compromise in the end, some of us prefer one end of the compromise some the other, its the middle ground that is the 'holy grail' . . .
CJSF