Hi Matthew,
I am with you on that and my personal limited experiences with hifi are in line with what you are saying. However, for the sake of constructive arguent, let us consider this: Say we were to test two amplifiers that according to reviews are very very 'distinct'. I can think of Naim as one example and perhaps a Creek as a distinctly different sound (?). If we keep every variable constant (person listening, music track, speakers, cables, time of day, level matched sound, room ec) and we then proceed to swap the amplifier from a Naim to a Creek (assume we do a blind testing), do you think that the person listening will not be able to tell the amplifiers apart?
I used the examples of Naim and Creek simply because I think they are described by numerous reviews as quite distinct sounding. In reference to my original thoughts about soundstage, Naim is usually discussed as poorly performing in that respect. Creek amplifiers on the other hand seem to be commonly described as less punchy but with huge soundstage.
I would be interested in your thoughts...
matthewpiano said:
In my experience speakers do have a big impact on a system's capacity to properly recreate the soundstage or stereo image captured in the recording. In particular I've found that smaller, stand-mounted designs tend to succeed more convincingly than many floorstanders in this regard. This is one of the things that makes the LS3/5a such a wonderful loudspeaker, even with its obvious limitations in frequency range, and more recent monitor speakers with good quality drive units such as Dynaudio's DM2/6, PMC's DB1i, and Spendor's S3/5R have successfully built further on those skills.