The Difference Between Cheap and Expensive HDMI Cables

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

hammill

New member
Mar 20, 2008
212
0
0
RobinKidderminster said:
Exactly my dear LHC ! How can 'cables make no difference' be the final summary when 'reversing a lead' gives errors? As I said .... laughable?

A quick google shows there are "active" cables with electronics included which are apparently directional, perhaps that is what they are referring to?
 

AnotherJoe

New member
Jun 10, 2011
407
0
0
Why is it laughable?

Most hdmi cables are passive - but active hdmi cables tend to uni-directional as they have an IC at one end of the cable to help transmission over long runs.
 

RobinKidderminster

New member
May 27, 2009
582
0
0
Laughable when an article with the appearance of professionalism and technical accuracy makes schoolboy errors. No mention of active cables. Max length 10m in tests. Aforementioned contradictory evidence. My report writing was always 'proof read'. Maybe a lesson for someone.
 
B

BIGBERNARDBRESSLAW

Guest
The biggest difference between cheap and expensive hdmi leads is the price.
 

Alantiggger

Well-known member
Oct 14, 2007
274
33
18,920
BIGBERNARDBRESSLAW said:
The biggest difference between cheap and expensive hdmi leads is the price.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

this

Too many folks it would SEEM... have a LOT of money to throw-away on something they THINK to be better than it really IS.... up to them, I guess (lol)

As to the folks who Already Have over the years... ahh well, :?
 

AnotherJoe

New member
Jun 10, 2011
407
0
0
RobinKidderminster said:
Laughable when an article with the appearance of professionalism and technical accuracy makes schoolboy errors. No mention of active cables. Max length 10m in tests. Aforementioned contradictory evidence. My report writing was always 'proof read'. Maybe a lesson for someone.

I dont see the problem. They take different HDMI cables and take a snapshot at both ends of the cable and compare the md5s. All the

cables give 100% correct result with not a single wrong pixel.

Then to prove that they not just missing any errors which may be occurring, they try and force errors by using a uni-directional cable (I presume the Atlas Equator as thats an active cable) - and sure enough some errors are captured.
 

The_Lhc

Well-known member
Oct 16, 2008
1,176
1
19,195
RobinKidderminster said:
Exactly my dear LHC ! How can 'cables make no difference' be the final summary when 'reversing a lead' gives errors? As I said .... laughable?

Oh I see what you mean, you're coming at it from the opposite direction to what I thought you were, carry on!
 

Tarxman

New member
Jul 3, 2009
64
0
0
As overpriced as Monster is, I have found one benefit of their HDMI cables, as silly as it sounds, is the fact that they "bite" into the socket and grip tight. I previously had Van den Hul, which were fine, though anytime I moved anything even slightly, the damned things would fall out the back of my AVR and I'd have jam my head in there to sort it out.
 

BenLaw

Well-known member
Nov 21, 2010
475
7
18,895
You should have returned the cable. If such small movement made it fall out then it wasn't fit for purpose. All but one of my HDMIs cost less than a tenner, and they have never fallen out.
 

TRENDING THREADS