Thompsonuxb said:There really is only one way to sort this.
CnoEvil said:Thompsonuxb said:There really is only one way to sort this.
FIGHT? *aggressive*
Thompsonuxb said:Too many of you guys are pathetic!
CnoEvil said:FIGHT? *aggressive*
steve_1979 said:Thompsonuxb said:While alot can be explained by math alot cannot
What exactly is it about the conductivity of electricity isn't fully understood by science?
Thompsonuxb said:While alot can be explained by math alot cannot
Vladimir said:Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
...and surely conductivity is not the only factor here, is it? The materials, the dielectric, vibration, 'noise', may have a bearing upon results? Were it truly just a matter of conductivity then all cables would be the same as everyone would agree what was ideal.Vladimir said:steve_1979 said:Thompsonuxb said:While alot can be explained by math alot cannot
What exactly is it about the conductivity of electricity isn't fully understood by science?
Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
steve_1979 said:Vladimir said:Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
Could you expand on that?
Anderson said:steve_1979 said:Vladimir said:Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
Could you expand on that?
I believe he's yanking your chain.
Anderson said:steve_1979 said:Vladimir said:Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
Could you expand on that?
I believe he's yanking your chain.
nopiano said:As others have noted here before, the higher you go in hifi, the more divergence one finds.
steve_1979 said:Vladimir said:Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
Could you expand on that?
nopiano said:...and surely conductivity is not the only factor here, is it? The materials, the dielectric, vibration, 'noise', may have a bearing upon results? Were it truly just a matter of conductivity then all cables would be the same as everyone would agree what was ideal.?Vladimir said:steve_1979 said:Thompsonuxb said:While alot can be explained by math alot cannot
What exactly is it about the conductivity of electricity isn't fully understood by science?
Directional flow of electrons and cable memory in AC signals.
As others have noted here before, the higher you go in hifi, the more divergence one finds. Yet logically, with more budget you'd think ideas would coalesce around a preferred outcome - the sound of music!
steve_1979 said:Thompsonuxb said:While alot can be explained by math alot cannot
What exactly is it about the conductivity of electricity that you think isn't fully understood by science?
It's a very simple phenomenon that has been thoroughly been tested, proven, understood and documented. It's also totally and predictable by maths and has been proven millions of times to be totally accurate where theory and practice always match 100% perfectly.
Vladimir said:nopiano said:As others have noted here before, the higher you go in hifi, the more divergence one finds.?
Indeed. We find more of these.
Thompsonuxb said:The conductivity of electricity?
Thompsonuxb said:The conductivity of electricity?
It's what's carried within the electrical signal that's an issue were hifi is concerned.
The image that is produced in a space be it stereo, mono or 5.1 and beyond.
What science cannot explain is that 3d image. How different depth, width and height is achieved.
It's not just about the recording process as no two reproductions when played back are exactly the same.
Even when the same kit delivering the same sound can have vastly different results in rooms of similar size and construction. And why all this is so subjective.
If it was so predictable we would not be in threads like these - plug in and go is what we would have.
MeanandGreen said:Thompsonuxb said:The conductivity of electricity?
It's what's carried within the electrical signal that's an issue were hifi is concerned.
The image that is produced in a space be it stereo, mono or 5.1 and beyond.
What science cannot explain is that 3d image. How different depth, width and height is achieved.
It's not just about the recording process as no two reproductions when played back are exactly the same.
Even when the same kit delivering the same sound can have vastly different results in rooms of similar size and construction. And why all this is so subjective.
If it was so predictable we would not be in threads like these - plug in and go is what we would have.
?
What you are talking about now is not just about electricity. You are talking about acoustics, which is still science and mathematics.
The reason we will never have plug in and go is because of room acoustics. Most people have no clue about how their room interacts with the speakers, and I'd say that the vast majority of people dissatisfied with their system don't have it set up properly for their environment.?
The 3D image of space, depth, height and width etc... All comes down to how the speakers interact with their surroundings, acoustics/physics. The musical signal which gets to the speakers is all about electronics/electricity.?
Unless you listen to headphones, you are always listening to the distortion added by your listening room.
Anderson said:Hello Thompson. Trying to be tactful and friendly my friend. I respect that you have an opinion on this subject but it would appear that you're unable to express it properly as I have no idea what you're trying to explain. Hope I haven't offended you friend.
Thompsonuxb said:So all amps should sound the same?
Regardless of cost, an amp of 90watts costing 120£ should sound exactly like a 1000£ amp same room same speakers?
Cheap components able to deliver the same signal has expensive components.
It's all electrical.... Right?MeanandGreen said:Thompsonuxb said:The conductivity of electricity?
It's what's carried within the electrical signal that's an issue were hifi is concerned.
The image that is produced in a space be it stereo, mono or 5.1 and beyond.
What science cannot explain is that 3d image. How different depth, width and height is achieved.
It's not just about the recording process as no two reproductions when played back are exactly the same.
Even when the same kit delivering the same sound can have vastly different results in rooms of similar size and construction. And why all this is so subjective.
If it was so predictable we would not be in threads like these - plug in and go is what we would have.
What you are talking about now is not just about electricity. You are talking about acoustics, which is still science and mathematics.
The reason we will never have plug in and go is because of room acoustics. Most people have no clue about how their room interacts with the speakers, and I'd say that the vast majority of people dissatisfied with their system don't have it set up properly for their environment.
The 3D image of space, depth, height and width etc... All comes down to how the speakers interact with their surroundings, acoustics/physics. The musical signal which gets to the speakers is all about electronics/electricity.
Unless you listen to headphones, you are always listening to the distortion added by your listening room.
MeanandGreen said:Thompsonuxb said:So all amps should sound the same?
Regardless of cost, an amp of 90watts costing 120£ should sound exactly like a 1000£ amp same room same speakers?
Cheap components able to deliver the same signal has expensive components.
It's all electrical.... Right?MeanandGreen said:Thompsonuxb said:The conductivity of electricity?
It's what's carried within the electrical signal that's an issue were hifi is concerned.
The image that is produced in a space be it stereo, mono or 5.1 and beyond.
What science cannot explain is that 3d image. How different depth, width and height is achieved.
It's not just about the recording process as no two reproductions when played back are exactly the same.
Even when the same kit delivering the same sound can have vastly different results in rooms of similar size and construction. And why all this is so subjective.
If it was so predictable we would not be in threads like these - plug in and go is what we would have.
?
What you are talking about now is not just about electricity. You are talking about acoustics, which is still science and mathematics.
The reason we will never have plug in and go is because of room acoustics. Most people have no clue about how their room interacts with the speakers, and I'd say that the vast majority of people dissatisfied with their system don't have it set up properly for their environment.?
The 3D image of space, depth, height and width etc... All comes down to how the speakers interact with their surroundings, acoustics/physics. The musical signal which gets to the speakers is all about electronics/electricity.?
Unless you listen to headphones, you are always listening to the distortion added by your listening room.
I never said all amps sound the same. I was saying that speakers and acoustics play the biggest role in stereo imaging. I was trying to get across that imaging can be explained with science as it's all physics.
Mathematics would allow for the optimal listing environment to be designed for a given pair of speakers.
The music signal is carried by electricity for which we need electronics to reproduce. Some electronics will reproduce a more 'pure' signal than others. What you eventually hear are sound waves as a result of the interaction between the speakers and the air in the room. All of which is affected by room size & shape, furnishings, building materials etc... The electronics job is to get the signal to the speakers without degration which is actually the easiest part of the process.