Unexpected speaker cable surprise

[Thompsonuxb]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.?

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core.  Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

 

[steve_1979]

This is like watching an intellectual clash of the titans dueling it out to the death.

 

[TrevC]

This is like watching an intellectual clash of the titans dueling it out to the death.

Really? LOL.

 

[TrevC]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core. Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

 

[Thompsonuxb]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.?

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core.  Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

So are you including the 'sleeve'......?

 

[steve_1979]

More like shooting a frog in a bucket - question is who's the frog and who's holding the gun.

'Wibbit'.....does that sound like a frog.....

It's supposed to be "Fish in a barrel" and the word is "Wibble" not "Wibbit".

 

[steve_1979]

Really?

Yes. It's awe inspiring to watch.

I just wish I had the intellectual capacity to keep up.

 

[TrevC]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core. Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

So are you including the 'sleeve'......?

If you like.

 

[Thompsonuxb]

This is like watching an intellectual clash of the titans dueling it out to the death.

More like shooting a frog in a bucket - question is who's the frog and who's holding the gun.

'Wibble'.....does that sound like a frog.....

 

[Thompsonuxb]

More like shooting a frog in a bucket - question is who's the frog and who's holding the gun.

'Wibbit'.....does that sound like a frog.....

It's supposed to be "Fish in a barrel" and the word is "Wibble" not "Wibbit".

Nope, I meant a frog in a bucket....

And blame the spell corrector - edited it anyway...... ;-)

 

[Thompsonuxb]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.?

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core.  Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

So are you including the 'sleeve'......?

If you like.

If I like?....if I like??

Its still wrong - c'mon Trev......

 

[steve_1979]

And blame the spell corrector

For mixing up metaphors?

 

[steve_1979]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ri4vtu8y0O0

 

[Thompsonuxb]

And blame the spell corrector

For mixing up metaphors?

Wow......

I've mixed up nothing - I was gonna say toad!

Feel free to use 'my' metaphor in future, it's funnier than fish.....

 

[TrevC]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core. Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

So are you including the 'sleeve'......?

If you like.

If I like?....if I like??

Its still wrong - c'mon Trev......

What is still wrong?

 

[Thompsonuxb]

Oh c'mon boys the end game is near.....

The great cable debate is nearing a conclusion.

In a topic were using 'comparible' as a default disclaimer is a joke....i.e all cables are exactly the same - full stop or they are not, in which case it's logical there can be differences in the presentation of the music you hear via them.....

What say you?

I say two cables of equal resistance have little choice but to sound identical. It's those dratted laws of physics.?

We are real close now Trev, real close.

'equal resistance'

All the exotic compositions available and you wanna drop 'equal resistance' in....

Hence all cables MUST conform to the most basic cable - copper around a non conductive core for example?

Honestly?

Nope!!!

Lol....let me give you the chance to edit, you know if you stick with nope then the 'equal resistance' and 'comparible' disclaimers is thrown out the window and your beloved science kicks you in the a$$.....right?

Most cables have a non-conductive outer around a conductive core.  Not the way you said, LOL.

Which cables that?

You take a cheap cable take a strand and cut it and look at the cross section......

It'll look like a copper strand because......

Wibble.

Does this mean wiki confirmed you're wrong..... *ROFL*

No, I'm perfectly correct!

So are you including the 'sleeve'......?

If you like.

If I like?....if I like??

Its still wrong - c'mon Trev......

What is still wrong?

'Non conductive outer around a conductive core'....... *mosking*

 

[steve_1979]

What's your favourite type of cake Thompson?

 

[Thompsonuxb]

What's your favourite type of cake Thompson?

Steve, if you want to do the cheerleading/small cellmate thing for Trev fine. Honestly I have no problem with that.

But please add to the conversation - what's wrong with you?

If you disagree with me.... Cool. But give your reasoning or don't bother to respond and let the thread die.

Trev has no answers, it's clear.......if you want to save him.... Save him.

 

[Thompsonuxb]

'Non conductive outer around a conductive core'....... *mosking*

That TrevC eh? What a wierdo.

Imagine a cable with the insulation on the outside. LOL you guys. Who's ever heard of such a crazy thing.

The insulation?

Are you being deliberately stupid now?

 

[Vladimir]

I have a feeling you are all enjoying this, which is a cable thread blasphemy.

 

[steve_1979]

The insulation?

Isn't that the conductor bit? Y'know on the outside.

Are you being deliberately stupid now?

Sorry. I'm just trying to keep up.

 

[steve_1979]

I have a feeling you are all enjoying this, which is a cable thread blasphemy.

Hi Vlad.

I'm suprised that anyone else is still reading this rubbish TBH. I thought it was just me and Thompson.

 

[steve_1979]

Steve, if you want to do the cheerleading/small cellmate thing for Trev fine. Honestly I have no problem with that.

But please add to the conversation - what's wrong with you?

If you disagree with me.... Cool. But give your reasoning or don't bother to respond and let the thread die.

Trev has no answers, it's clear.......if you want to save him.... Save him.

Now you're just avoiding the question.

 

[Thompsonuxb]

I have a feeling you are all enjoying this, which is a cable thread blasphemy.?

Hi Vlad.?

I'm suprised that anyone else is still reading this rubbish TBH. I thought it was just me and Thompson.

You and I Steve?.....I thought it was TrevC I was dealing with!

Thought you were trying to save him.

This always happens when I'm right though.....lol.

I was done with this thread a few pages ago till Chebby drew me back in.

Ahwell.......

 

[steve_1979]

So... A question for Thompson.

Does a thick cable have less resistance than a thin cable of the same material?

Proportionally - do the math, did you not see the I=V/R example!

Its all relative.

But don't think of it as resistance but instead of the capacity to carry an electrical signal.

I prefer to think of cables as water pipes and music as the cherry flavoured custard being pumped through them. It makes it easier to visualise that way.