The Devialet thread

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
DocG said:
oldric_naubhoff said:
DocG said:
So I checked the Store Locator on the website, and my Devialet dealer happens to figure on the list. I dropped him a mail. If he has a demo set available, I could have a listen later this week. How about that?

If all goes well, I'll report back. Of course.

damn you Doc! I really envy you that you have so easy access to check out things that interest me. I have hard time time auditioning things that don't interest me, not mentioning those that do. well, I guess it's time to move back to Europe then ;) . anyway, looknig forward to hearing your impressions from the demo. I in the mean time will try to get on with Opalum and ask them a few technical questions about their products. if I hear what I expect then it really may be a viable option outside of legacy hi-fi products. let's hope Opalum are approachable and knowledgeble lot.

When I started my hifi-search, I thought Belgium was Europe's hifi-desert. But by now, I know my way in the desert pretty well! Having said that, the dealer didn't confirm anything yet...

Meanwhile, I'm still very interested in some more background knowledge. So if you learn anything more, please share!

Update: my dealer just confirmed he has the Flow.1010 on demo. We can give it a try on Thursday! :cheers:
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
DocG said:
Update: my dealer just confirmed he has the Flow.1010 on demo. We can give it a try on Thursday! :cheers:

The (only?) UK dealer is Stone Audio in Poole. They stock some very good kit, e.g. Devialet, Sonus faber ( :shifty: ). Sounds hopeful.

Doc, I will be whistling past you this weekend on the train to and from a conference in Utrecht.

:wave:
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
matt49 said:
Doc, I will be whistling past you this weekend on the train to and from a conference in Utrecht. :wave:

OK, I'll stand sentry and wave back as you pass by. You can recognize me by my funny hat and red mustache.

When in Holland, do taste the local gastronomy: a croquette bun with a mug of buttermilk! (Sorry, Cheeseboy)
 

oldric_naubhoff

New member
Mar 11, 2011
23
0
0
Visit site
DocG said:
Update: my dealer just confirmed he has the Flow.1010 on demo. We can give it a try on Thursday! :cheers:

I spoke to an Opalum bloke from Dennmark on the phone today. I have some mixed feelings. mainly because I got a feeling there's the highlight on the lifestyle aspect of the product at Opalum and the guy couldn't provide me with most information I needed. here's what I found out.

4810 and 1010 are 2-way speakers. 4810 have 3 tweeters covering HF and the rest of the array covers mids and lows groupped in 3 banks of drivers. similar situation with 1010 where single driver handles HF and the rest are responsible for remaining part of the frequency spectrum, again groupped in 3 banks of drivers.

common problem with driver arrays is comb filtering effect. Opalum claims to overcome this problem by delaying some of the drivers with relation to other. this information poured some optimism in me with regards design skillls of the people behind the speakers. delaying of drivers reminds me of CBT approach to achieve unified soundfield. however, I can't confirm it's really the case here because when I asked the guy about off axis behaviour of the speakers he couldn't say much about it as he didn't have any measurements for that aspect.

the guy couldn't tell me much about distortion levels of the speaker. which is a pitty. I'd rather know how loud could the speakers be pushed before you start feel uncomfortable.

the speakers don't employ "virtual sub" technology (this is propably to be used in small portable devices). all bass there is comes from the source material and the drivers.

wireless compatibility is via Bluetooth APT-X modul. useful for quick connecting of different devices. this is included in their Hub II. but I think to fully utilise lossles audio it's better to use a LAN streamer.

what I really liked when I heard is that the speakers are optimised in such a way as to generate a perfect impulse response. that means no ringing! and that means the speakers should be very easy on the ear. there should be no perceived harshness nor undue sibilance to the sound. on top of that the speakers' frequency response is tuned in such a way as to highlight it's inherent smoothness to the sound. the guy told me they lift slightly mid-lows and highs. this bit bothered me somehow as I would like to see a flat frequency response. but I can't deny Opalum have a point in saying the speaker should do what it's asked for in a way that's pleasing to the listener. then again if you check those basic measurements in the review of flow.1010 at soundandvision.com there's no hint of any frequency response shaping over neutral. you can see some shaping in the graph for stream.210 though.

I also wanted to aks about the volume control but I forgot. it's definitely in digital domain as the speakers and the hub are digital throughout. but what interests me most is if they use those advanced 32bit floating point techniques to obtain lossles attenuation (BTW this approach beats by a big margin any analog attenuation that there is).

all in all I wasn't overly taken aback. the guy was constantly stressing how nice the speakers sound. I guess hearing is believing. he suggested I could take advantage of their sales and return policy so that I could try the speakers at home if I opted to buy via their web-shop. handy. I guess I let my mind settle down for a couple of days and I might give them a call again to ask a few more questions. in the mean time I'm looking forward to reading your impressions from the demo on Thursday Doc.

BTW, a few weeks ago I was contacting audiostatic with a view to get some info on their ESL speaker as I am looking to upgrade on my MG12. the guy on the other side told me, and I was talking to Mr. Ben Peters - the inventor himself 8) , that they are now finalising R+D on the new model which should be ready for sale quite soon. most likely in January. he mentioned they are using some new nano technology in the making, I presume it has to do with diaphragm material and coating techniques, and the new speakers will sound much better than any of his previous creations. I guess I'll wait a bit and see what his new babies are capable of and then decide if I slim down with Opalum or stay in legacy hi-fi world. although I must admit a Dev and stats look like a nice, minimalist and high performance set up. if only stats weren't taking up so much space.....
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
oldric_naubhoff said:
BTW, a few weeks ago I was contacting audiostatic with a view to get some info on their ESL speaker as I am looking to upgrade on my MG12. the guy on the other side told me, and I was talking to Mr. Ben Peters - the inventor himself 8) , that they are now finalising R+D on the new model which should be ready for sale quite soon. most likely in January.

Ha, reminds me of that other Dutch ESL, Essence. Mr. Rapaport said they would be available in Belgium in July 2013, then September 2013, and my latest e-mail (2 weeks ago) was not replied to anymore...

I hope Audiostatic does it better.

Well... I'm not really in a hurry yet, not before the house is ready. :wall:
 

canyelles

New member
Nov 29, 2013
0
0
0
Visit site
Hi, new Devialet 170 owner here.

Although I am more than pleased with the performance, I have a few operational issues.

Hoping someone can give me some useful information or at least commiseration.

The main problem is as follows ...

The Devialet website says that when you play a file from iTunes using Air or Ethernet, the whole file is sent to the amp, reassembled and then played.I really don't think I believe this. First of all I can see my music disk blinking occasionally while the music is playing. Secondly, and annoyingly, If I produce any other sound on the Mac (say playing a music clip on amazon) it plays through the amp at the same time

Perhaps they would say you should have a dedicated PC but I dont :-(

Other issues ...

The iPad/iPhone app seems to be a battery killer.

The Air app on my iMac does NOT start up at boot time despite being set up that way.

Air seems to not work very well. This morning I had the Air link but could not get Ethernet working. In the end I flashed a new configuration and it all worked. Don't want to do that every day.

Probably not Devialet's fault but I could not get my Squeezebox Touch (with Triode's USB output mods) to work at all. Have had to use spdif from the Touch.

Anyone have any help or comments?

Thanks
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
canyelles said:
Hi, new Devialet 170 owner here.

Although I am more than pleased with the performance, I have a few operational issues.

Hoping someone can give me some useful information or at least commiseration.

The main problem is as follows ...

The Devialet website says that when you play a file from iTunes using Air or Ethernet, the whole file is sent to the amp, reassembled and then played.I really don't think I believe this. First of all I can see my music disk blinking occasionally while the music is playing.

Hello canyelles, welcome to the forum, and to the Devialet-club!

When using AIR, your Devialet takes control over the computer's clock. It tells the clock when to send the data. So indeed, your computer is still at work when listening to music from it. I'm not sure that's a problem with a Mac (which presumably has a SSD and is quite quiet).

canyelles said:
Secondly, and annoyingly, If I produce any other sound on the Mac (say playing a music clip on amazon) it plays through the amp at the same time

Perhaps they would say you should have a dedicated PC but I dont :-(

AFAIK, when using AIR (wireless or over Ethernet), your computer sees the Devialet as an external soundcard. That is nice, because you can stream everything from your computer to your hifi, be it Spotify, YouTube or your own ripped music. You discovered the drawback indeed, every other sound file goes straight to your amplifier too. Not much you can do about that, I'm afraid. Using USB would give you the same result...

canyelles said:
Other issues ...

The iPad/iPhone app seems to be a battery killer.

The Air app on my iMac does NOT start up at boot time despite being set up that way.

Air seems to not work very well. This morning I had the Air link but could not get Ethernet working. In the end I flashed a new configuration and it all worked. Don't want to do that every day.

Probably not Devialet's fault but I could not get my Squeezebox Touch (with Triode's USB output mods) to work at all. Have had to use spdif from the Touch.

Let's summarize: AIR is not ready yet for use in the real world. I suppose it works excellently in their test facility. But indeed, I just don't use it (yet). Let's hope for a firmware upgrade in the near future to solve the bugs. But for now, I just use my CDP and Sonos:Connect as sources.

Correction: For now, I use a Sonos Play:3 as my main hifi system in the living room. My Devialet went up in smoke last weekend... :wall:
 

canyelles

New member
Nov 29, 2013
0
0
0
Visit site
Thank you for your reply, some useful information there.

I think you have misunderstood my point about the disk drive working during playback though. I am not complaining about noise or anything like that.

I am simply putting forward the fact that the disk drive containing my music is working intermittently during playback as proof that the devialet does not work as they say it does. i.e. it does not read the whole current music file, transport to the amp and then play it.

In fact it works just as a squeezebox, filling up its buffer when necessary.

I guess you are right about USB, I have only used USB to a dac from a squeezebox. My iMac is too far away to do it directly.

Sorry to hear about your Devialet. Good luck with that.

Thanks again
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
Last Thursday, I demoed some more speakers with the Devialet 110. My dealer had finally managed to borrow a pair of Audio Note AN-Ks (no AN-Js unfortunately), so I had to hear them before they left again. Also in the line-up: the Acoustic Energy AE1 MkIIISE and the PMC Twenty 22. After that I also had the Opalum Flow.1010 system on the menu (see this thread), so it would be a busy day.

First off were the Audio Notes. They were superbly finished in a gorgeous bird's eye maple veneer. The audition took place in a heavily treated home cinema demo room (the rest of the shop was taken for a big Naim - PMC event), so I had no proper hard wall to place them against. So the dealer allowed me to put a pair of PMC Fact 8s (sideways) behind the ANs, as an ersatz front wall. :grin: This worked fine: the bass was markedly deeper, though less tight. The sound was very easy on the ear, natural. Acoustic instruments sounded like the real thing, keeping their timbre. This was most obvious with sax and trumpets. Dynamics were OK, though I had expected better (then again, the AN-K has 'only' a 90 dB sensitivity, while the bigger models do upto 98 dB: might be a different story there). I listened for about 1.5 hours, very focused, and no fatigue at all! That's good!

Next in line were the PMC Twenty 22s. Very different! It took me some time to settle down. Once I got used to their presentation, I really liked what I heard. The tonal balance was very neutral. The bass was there, not as prominent as with the ANs (though on specs the PMCs go deeper), but better defined, better textured (Christian McBride's double bass!) and fast! They just squeezed more information out of the recording; a bluray vs. DVD analogy came to mind. The stereo image was also sharper that the ANs'. In conclusion: the ANs were good... but the 22s are better, or rather: more to my taste.

The AE1 only got a short listen. They are not for me. The lack of bass is just too prominent for me to like them. Maybe when properly blended with a good sub, but on their own they didn't do it for me.

I already mentioned the Naim - PMC event taking place in the shop. They were building several set-ups. The entry-level set was a UnitiQute + Twenty21s and Wafer 2s. The Wafers were not properly set up yet; they still stood on the floor, leaning against the wall, but the sound the Qute pulled out of them was already remarkable. I definitely want to hear them properly set up, driven by my Devialet. But that's for later...

And then there was my first acquintance with the Opalum system, but that's another story...

All in all, I didn't get that much wiser. I can bar the AN-Ks, but maybe the AN-J could be more to my liking... And I should hear the two PMCs side by side, with the same Dev.

Though I have a hunch that I didn't hear my dream speakers yet. I think it's got to do with the boxes. Having heard Maggies and Quad ESLs, it's hard to go back. But a panel bookshelf? I've still got the Vivids on my list, and the Gurus. Or maybe I'll just buy a pair of AG Stradas blind after all...
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
Hey Doc,

Very interesting report on the ANs. I've always assumed they'd be good for valve amps but not so exciting for SS amps, and that there are more exciting solutions for the Dev.

I passed through Belgium on Thursday and didn't see you. You need to wear a bigger hat or something!

:cheers:

Matt
 

WishTree

Well-known member
May 18, 2010
107
1
18,595
Visit site
DocG said:
Though I have a hunch that I didn't hear my dream speakers yet. I think it's got to do with the boxes. Having heard Maggies and Quad ESLs, it's hard to go back. But a panel bookshelf? I've still got the Vivids on my list, and the Gurus. Or maybe I'll just buy a pair of AG Stradas blind after all...

That is an interesting review on AN.

My upgrade path has Vivid Audio in BOLD! So, IMO, till the time you listen to Vivid 1.5 or V1S, whichever works, I would suggest you to put a hold on any blind purchases except that there is a great deal and in worst case the damages are minimal.

I have a feeling that Vivid will tick all the boxes :pray:
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
matt49 said:
Hey Doc,

Very interesting report on the ANs. I've always assumed they'd be good for valve amps but not so exciting for SS amps, and that there are more exciting solutions for the Dev.

I passed through Belgium on Thursday and didn't see you. You need to wear a bigger hat or something!

:cheers:

Matt

Oh man! I was on the look-out all Friday! :doh:
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
One virtue of the Devialet is that it’s (fairly) portable. Today I packed it up and took it on its first outing. (You’ll notice that unlike Doc’s female Devialet, mine is still resolutely neuter in gender.) So off to Walrus Systems in Marylebone to try out the obscure but well regarded Marshall Choong speakers.

The marketing spiel is that the designer of these boxes has tried to emulate the “walk-in” realism of the Quad ESL63’s mid-range, but with the advantages of a box’s bass extension. The review of the FS1 on Hifi Pig here seems to fall for this “Quad-ESL-in-a-box” shtick. I’m not so sure, as you’ll see.

The Devialet was fed by a Pure Sound A8000 CDP via SPDIF.

Marshall Choong FS1

These are two-way floorstanders, about 1m tall, with a bass port about half way up the rear panel. They’re very well finished in oak veneer. They retail for £2400.

The first impression is of a subtle and pleasantly airy, but slightly boxy presentation. Certainly the sound was very fast and vividly present in the room. Piano was nice and sharp, violin was pure, airy, and delicate. That was combined with well extended but nicely controlled bass. Altogether plenty of impact but also control. Dynamics were excellent. I was also impressed by the integration of the drivers: the crossover seemed pretty well invisible.

Now for the downside. I was unhappy with the boxiness. It affected voices especially, which sounded a tad nasal and strangled. Also the top end, though it had good presence, was a bit aggressive and,yes, even distorted.

Having said that, for their price these are extremely respectable speakers. But I’d rather have my Sonus fabers, which just sound more natural.

Marshall Choong CM3

Now the next rung up the ladder, and a different format. The CM3s are a BBC-style, sealed-box design, of the same format and size as the Harbeth SHL5s. An interesting comparison, though at £3400 they’re a bit pricier. And there are some differences in design. Both are three-way designs, but whereas the SHL5s’ “third driver” is a 20mm supertweeter, in the CM3s it’s a 150mm mid-woofer. Also the bass drivers are of different materials: Harbeth uses its proprietary RADIAL™ stuff; the Marshall Choongs use aluminium.

Initially the presentation seems quite similar to the Harbies: airy, musical, natural. The texture on piano is very revealing, but at the same time the top end is much less edgy than the FS1s: better controlled, more civilised, purer, and also it seems to reach higher. I guess it’s just a better tweeter than the one used in the FS1s.

I was impressed by the extremely precise imaging. On one of my demo opera tracks, two voices that in most systems seem to come from the same place, were clearly standing right next to one another: close but separate.

Again, like the Harbeths, the CM3s did very fine discrimination between instrumental timbres. Acoustic guitars were particularly lovely. Arguably bass was less deep and rich than with the FS1s. And all in all I felt there was something a bit restrained or reined in. Big choral stuff just didn't have as much scale as it should, even though the music was spread nicely across the stage. Sure, the CM3s went nice and loud without distortion. But there was still a bit of boxiness that I don’t get with my Sonus fabers.

So a bit of a mixed bag. Of their type and at their price point, these are very good speakers. The CM3s are markedly better than the FS1s: side-by-side comparison with the Harbeth SHL5s would be interesting (though the Harbeths would surely win). But both the Marshall Choong models have a slight boxiness and are more forward and less natural-sounding than my Sonus fabers.

I went to the opera last night. My Sonus fabers, small though they are, do a great job of reproducing the experience of live opera. I'm not sure that the Marshall Choongs do.

:cheers:

Matt
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
Macspur said:
Excellent right up as per usual Matt, thank you.

Although by the sounds of it, not for you, certainly seems like a speaker that could easily be on someones short list and good that you've given it some exposure.

What's up next?

Mac

www.macsmusic.blogbubble.net

Cheers, Mac.

Maybe I was a bit harsh on the Marshall Choongs, but they're just not as natural as the Sonus fabers.

As for my next speaker demo: I plan to hear some Audiovectors, and I'd like to hear the new "curved" ATC SCM40s. But they'll have to wait until January. I also have my eye on Devore and Triangle.

As things stand my shortlist consists of the Sonus faber Olympica IIs and the Vivid 1.5s. I'd like it to be a longer list ...

The final decision will probably be made next summer. Gulp!

:cheers:

Matt
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
matt49 said:
You’ll notice that unlike Doc’s female Devialet, mine is still resolutely neuter in gender.

Yes, Debby has been very ill. She was treated in Paris and all is well now, so I've been told. In fact, she already travelled to Antwerp again. I'll try and bring her home next weekend. So normally, we could go out next week to find her some fine speakers! She says the Vivids are ugly, but I told her that real beauty is more than skindeep! And we might even be introduced to Anthony Gallo's cute little Stradas!

Nice writing again, Matt! I think I for one am going "out of the box" now, with the Vivids and Stradas, and also these Belgian designs! It's in Mr. Vaessen's place, that I'll probably be able to hear the Stradas. He has them in for a couple of days before he'll install them in a project in Ostend. If all goes well, that's for next week...

:cheers:
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
DocG said:
Yes, Debby has been very ill. She was treated in Paris and all is well now, so I've been told. In fact, she already travelled to Antwerp again. I'll try and bring her home next weekend. So normally, we could go out next week to find her some fine speakers! She says the Vivids are ugly, but I told her that real beauty is more than skindeep! And we might even be introduced to Anthony Gallo's cute little Stradas!

Whilst not wanting to pry into confidential medical details, could you give us a sense of what was wrong? (I'm a bit surprised by "Debby" -- my money would have been on something more French: Colette or Genevieve perhaps ...)

DocG said:
Nice writing again, Matt! I think I for one am going "out of the box" now, with the Vivids and Stradas, and also these Belgian designs! It's in Mr. Vaessen's place, that I'll probably be able to hear the Stradas. He has them in for a couple of days before he'll install them in a project in Ostend. If all goes well, that's for next week...

:cheers:

Vaessens look interesting. The Aquarius/Galaxy models have a bit of the Vivid about them. Are the Orb monitors as small as they look?

SFs are also "out of the box" in a way, as they use curved enclosures to break up internal resonances.

:cheers:

Matt
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
matt49 said:
DocG said:
Yes, Debby has been very ill. She was treated in Paris and all is well now, so I've been told. In fact, she already travelled to Antwerp again. I'll try and bring her home next weekend. So normally, we could go out next week to find her some fine speakers! She says the Vivids are ugly, but I told her that real beauty is more than skindeep! And we might even be introduced to Anthony Gallo's cute little Stradas!

Whilst not wanting to pry into confidential medical details, could you give us a sense of what was wrong?

Matt, as we are close friends, Debby and I have no secrets for you:

Devialet said:
Regarding your problem : this was the electronic circuit that allows to turn the LED on the rear of the unit showing that the main is powered that had a problem. Don't be worried, this circuit is not used for audio reproduction. Of course the electronic card of the lamp has been changed.

matt49 said:
(I'm a bit surprised by "Debby" -- my money would have been on something more French: Colette or Genevieve perhaps ...)

Oooh, Genevieve... Sounds more like a 170 to me! :) Debby's last name sounds more French: Allez.

matt49 said:
DocG said:
Nice writing again, Matt! I think I for one am going "out of the box" now, with the Vivids and Stradas, and also these Belgian designs! It's in Mr. Vaessen's place, that I'll probably be able to hear the Stradas. He has them in for a couple of days before he'll install them in a project in Ostend. If all goes well, that's for next week...

Vaessens look interesting. The Aquarius/Galaxy models have a bit of the Vivid about them. Are the Orb monitors as small as they look?

They remind me of Vivid indeed. And so does their price ticket, somewhere between 18.000 and 25.000 EUR per pair. :doh:

The Orb is "cheaper", at 5.000 or 7.500 EUR per pair (depending on the tweeter you choose). I asked him for some specs (dimensions, frequency response, ...) but got no answer yet. But they do look tiny indeed.
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
DocG said:
Matt, as we are close friends, Debby and I have no secrets for you:

Devialet said:
Regarding your problem : this was the electronic circuit that allows to turn the LED on the rear of the unit showing that the main is powered that had a problem. Don't be worried, this circuit is not used for audio reproduction. Of course the electronic card of the lamp has been changed.

Well, that's good news: it sounds like a pretty trivial problem.

DocG said:
Oooh, Genevieve... Sounds more like a 170 to me! :) Debby's last name sounds more French: Allez.

Now you've got me thinking that my 170 could be Debby's brother; because he now lives in England he's anglicized his name: Dave E. Allez. :oops:
 

DocG

Well-known member
May 1, 2012
54
4
18,545
Visit site
DocG said:
I think I for one am going "out of the box" now, with the Vivids and Stradas, and also these Belgian designs! It's in Mr. Vaessen's place, that I'll probably be able to hear the Stradas. He has them in for a couple of days before he'll install them in a project in Ostend. If all goes well, that's for next week...

Damn, probably too optimistic! The Dutch distributor just warned me that the container from the US will reach the European distributor (in the UK) on Tuesday. The goods are then sent to Holland, and from there to Mr. Vaessen. Doesn't sound like they will be there by Thursday...

I hope he has to reschedule the Ostend project, so that I still have time to hear the Stradas the week after that...

If not, it might be a loooong time before I have another occasion :cry:
 

matt49

Well-known member
Apr 7, 2013
51
1
18,540
Visit site
Occasionally on this forum people draw comparisons between the subjective assessment of hifi and wine tasting. On my favourite wine website -- the famous Purple Pages of the magisterial Jancis Robinson -- there's a piece comparing ... yes, wine and hifi. And believe it or not, one of the systems the wine writer (the excellent Richard Hemmings) listens to is the Devialet 240 and Vivid 1.5s. Of this system he writes that " the low register of the piano had an uncanny clarity. There was no muddiness: every note was bright and clear. There was a tremendous purity, too. All these adjectives can apply equally to wine – young trocken Riesling, perhaps, or Hawke’s Bay Syrah."

I'm afraid that to read the piece in full you have to subscribe to the site, which costs real money. It's a great website though, and its forum, which unlike this place isn't anonymous, is well informed, well behaved, and well moderated.

Here's a trailer for the article with a nice picture of a shiny box: http://www.jancisrobinson.com/articles/a201311182.html

:cheers:

Matt
 

Macspur

Well-known member
May 3, 2010
843
3
18,540
Visit site
Interesting... think the poor old SF's might be getting a little twitchy

smiley-smile.gif


Mac

www.macsmusic.blogbubble.net
 

WishTree

Well-known member
May 18, 2010
107
1
18,595
Visit site
I think Vivid V1.5 are very good speakers and knd of bargain if one considers Devialet as a bargain (I do so!) though I only heard them seperately and not the combo together.

Again, IMO, Devialet 110 / 170 + Vivid 1.5 and Devialet 240 / two in mono + Vivid Giya G3 / G4 are more or less sure shot winners even for the most picky listeners. The first combo is a little bit low on low bass and might need a sub based on how much of low bass one needs. Enjoying AG Stradas, I find V1.5 are already very good!

It looks like sooner than later, there might be owner's thread with Devialet + Vivid and I would love to join it as owner than just an admirer, as I am right now :)
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts