Shrek
Well-known member
can i ask why not ?I don’t have a tv 😶🌫️
can i ask why not ?I don’t have a tv 😶🌫️
A multitude of reasons. Main one being when I do watch things,, I'm happy enough with my macbook.can i ask why not ?
After my 5.1 surround failed, I used my hifi speakers for quite a while but with my partner at the other end of the sofa and each with a speaker pretty much in front of us, it was a challenge to get the sound right, as each of use would predominantly hear the speakers in front - I ended up directing the speaker in front of me towards my partner and the one in front of her facing directly towards me so they kinda crossed in the middle of the room. Better but not ideal.I visit a lot of homes with work. It used to surprise me how few people had anything resembling a Hi-Fi system even before the rise of smart speakers.
Since the advent of flat screen TV's I started to see more surround systems and soundbars, but they both seem to be in decline too.
This got me wondering how audiophiles and hi-fi enthusiasts listen to their TV's.
Not sure if this will let vote myself, so I will start- dedicated 7.1 surround system.
I personally use a dedicated 5.1 home cinema system, nothing very fancy, certainly doesn't match my 2.1 system. I haven't used anything else for many years.I visit a lot of homes with work. It used to surprise me how few people had anything resembling a .............
A fair question.Why don't any of the manufacturers build a modular design TV which could have the amp and speakers as an option?
Pioneer used to do this with their plasmas. It limits their appeal to others though - I ended up having to give mine away when I upgraded.This brings me to something that has been at the back of my mind for a good while. Why do we have to buy a TV with a set of speakers and an amplifier built in, regardless of how poor they are? Why don't any of the manufacturers build a modular design TV which could have the amp and speakers as an option?
Demand for this that of option is not there, so they don't bother with it. (99% of those that buy TVs just buy something that looks nice, with enthusiasts accounting for about 1% of sales)I personally use a dedicated 5.1 home cinema system, nothing very fancy, certainly doesn't match my 2.1 system. I haven't used anything else for many years.
This brings me to something that has been at the back of my mind for a good while. Why do we have to buy a TV with a set of speakers and an amplifier built in, regardless of how poor they are? Why don't any of the manufacturers build a modular design TV which could have the amp and speakers as an option?
I started using optical as I had a spare one at the time I got the receiver. it was fine at first, but when I added extra speakers (7.1) it can't always cope. I got a noise that sounded like a mix between static and baffle rattle. I spoke to the people in the shop who explained optical doesn't have the bandwidth for the data of 7.1. I moved over to HDMI, using the ARC input on the TV meats the receiver comes on when I turn the TV on, and I can use by TV ore firestick remote to control the volume.I've a 2018 or 2019 Samsung, 4K model, have set the audio output to Optical in the TV settings, and manage the audio volume using the AVI volume control (as in, not the Samsung's). It seems the frequency of your remote matches that of the amp too. I use a basic 4 component One For All remote as the stand-in for the AVI one, to preserve the latter. Works fine and it doubles up as a replacement TV remote too. Think it was about £20.
I started using optical as I had a spare one at the time I got the receiver. it was fine at first, but when I added extra speakers (7.1) it can't always cope. I got a noise that sounded like a mix between static and baffle rattle. I spoke to the people in the shop who explained optical doesn't have the bandwidth for the data of 7.1. I moved over to HDMI, using the ARC input on the TV meats the receiver comes on when I turn the TV on, and I can use by TV ore firestick remote to control the volume.
I have been using my stereo system for TV sound since the 1980s. I first used my stereo VCR to connect to my stereo. It had RCA out. I've never liked the sound of TVs and with the arrival of stereo sound it always seemed a waste to me not to use that potential.
The stereo VCR had another great trick up its sleeve: I used it as a recorder for FM radio broadcasts. Excellent sound quality and the option to record up to 4 hours of sound while I was away.
Then came the stereo TVs. I had one without RCA out and got a Scart to stereo RCA out adapter to connect to the stereo.
I have never gone for a home cinema setup. Simply too many speakers and cables. But I do appreciate excellent sound when I watch TV.
In our current setup the TV is connected with the Yamaha network receiver by an optical cable. All sound from the TV is routed through the stereo.
Our secondary TV in the bedroom (which we hardly ever watch anymore) is connected to an old Sony mini system by a Scart to RCA adapter. The sound is much better than the TV.
My suggestion for improving TV sound in a relatively cheap way is to find an old mini system with decent speakers and connect your TV to that. You may have to buy an adapter or cheap DAC if your TV doesn't have analogue outputs. Since most TV speakers are nothing to write home about you will get better sound with almost any mini stereo system.