Does What Hi-FI Ever Post a Bad Review?!?

[Messiah]

This is a Stuff review but I have noticed over the years WHF reviews seem to mimic Stuff reviews and it’s basically what WHF put in their review.

Pretty sure back when that review was written (2007), both brands fell under Haymarket so there were a lot of similar views across the 2 brands.

 

[jjbomber]

No, WHF is owned by Future Publishing .

I stand corrected.

 

[Gel Man]

Pretty sure back when that review was written (2007), both brands fell under Haymarket so there were a lot of similar views across the 2 brands.

Yes, that sounds right. 👍

 

[900sl]

I thought WHF reviews were generated by AI from a bag of word salad including 'verve, air, slam, grip, authority, careful matching' and you get an extra star if your product has Cambridge in the name?

 

[keithiepoo]

Well, I stimulated a conversation, didn't I. I appreciate some of the answers, and would like to believe that reviews are generally positive because the poorer products have been weeded out. I don’t know if I buy that or not, but I cannot disprove it.

Thanks folks.

 

[Gel Man]

I buy products recommended by WHF all the time and don’t regret it. 😎 I always have done going back 26 years now. 👍

 

[GroeneLeeuw]

I buy products recommended by WHF all the time and don’t regret it. 😎 I always have done going back 26 years now. 👍

If you buy such great products, why do you keep buying others?
Are you not happy with the quality of the products that you bought first?

 

[Gel Man]

If you buy such great products, why do you keep buying others?
Are you not happy with the quality of the products that you bought first?

I like and trust the reviews the rest comes down to personal choice and circumstances…

I also like upgrading a lot and WHF help me do that and my ability to find bargains too helps with that.