ISAC69 said:
davidvann said:
hi trev c ,no im not missing the point,the point is at every given chance you are always putting people down saying there findings are wrong ,cables i/c isolation burn in,i dont think at any point that you may of considerd you might be wrong,and there findings might be very real to them.ive never seen a book the laws of hifi by trev c,i dont claim to be an expert,but i dont go about putting people down for what there hearing,sorry i feel better now after my little rant.:silenced:
TrevC thinks he is a big expert in the Hi Fi world : all the cables sound the same to him , there is no need for burn in period for components act. act.
The true is that is hearing isn't sensitive enough to notice all the differences that distinguishing between good Hi Fi system to a medicore one .but he will never admit that sad true :wall:
So, to summarise, you think my ears are simply not good enough to hear imaginary differences that you can hear in items that cannot possibly sound different. I think I can live with that.
"Anyone who has listened to loudspeakers cables and line-level interconnects will have discovered that cables and interconnects start to sound better (smoother treble,greater ease, less grain, more dimensioal soundstage) after they've been in the system for a few days. this phenomenon is often called "break-in" . I
t's easy to understand " break-in" of loudspeakers drivers and phono cartridges (the rubber surround in loudspeaker deivers and the rubber suspension in cartridges relaxes with use) ... "
The Complete Guide to High-End Audio by Robert Harley . Ch. 11 p. 293
Don't give me the nunsense that I imagine things ...