BenLaw said:matthewpiano said:I think this forum has reached a real low point.
It's certainly a bit poor of late. There seem to be three posters whose primary aim is to antagonise the others.
Couldnt have put it better myself guys.
BenLaw said:matthewpiano said:I think this forum has reached a real low point.
It's certainly a bit poor of late. There seem to be three posters whose primary aim is to antagonise the others.
Vladimir said:Just kidding Trev!
Trying to illustrate that us being silly has nothing to do with hi-fi or electronic or acoustic theory. Its just a co*ck fight at this point.
:beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:
Music!
CnoEvil said:ISAC69 said:Hi CnoEvil :wave:
I absolutely agree with you expensive cables are certainly not a guarantee for a better sound , But I don't accept that some peoples here saying that all cables sound the same ,
I am intresting to know after hearing many different sort of cables what is your conclusion ?
I don't want to get embroiled again, but a few of my general conclusions are:
- I generally like companies that design and build their own cables (eg. Atlas, Cardas)
- I prefer all copper cables
- I haven't liked most Silver coated cables that I've heard
- Solid silver is better (than silver coated), but not matched with bright sounding electronics.
So yes, I have heard differences, but ime, it is vital to get the electonics right before experimenting.
Vladimir said:matthewpiano said:I think this forum has reached a real low point.
Condescending attitudes are also a negativity. Best to steer clear of things that annoy you and leave up to the moderator's judgment to keep things in order.
matthewpiano said:Vladimir said:matthewpiano said:I think this forum has reached a real low point.
Condescending attitudes are also a negativity. Best to steer clear of things that annoy you and leave up to the moderator's judgment to keep things in order.
Not being condescending, just saying it like it is.
Oh, and don't tell me what to do.
TrevC said:hifikrazy said:TrevC said:hifikrazy said:So a high end 300 watt amp sounds no different than a cheap 30 watter because they share some cheap electronic parts.
An expensive TV performs no better than a budget model because it’s the basically the same thing dressed in fancy clothes.
A Jag is no different than a Fiesta because both take their passengers from point A to B.
A mansion in The Hamptons is no different than a house in a Bombay slum because they’re just a roof over the head.
As a remedy for inferiority complex, I have to say it’s not actually a bad strategy to convince yourself of the above “truths”. I’m not materialistic and not saying that any of the above stuff really matters, but this kind of thinking is pure fantasy made up by people who feel the need to console themselves, and there seem to be quite a few hanging around this forum. Ironically they’re the ones accusing others of being delusional.
The above "truths" are strawmen arguments and not what was actually said at all.
The first two are directly credited to you actually.
"Expensive amplifiers can, and do, often use exactly the same parts as cheap ones because electronics is cheap. Those that do will invariable sound the same. "
"Of course the cheapie would probably be put in a cheap case and look rubbish, but that's beside the point. Much of the expensive stuff is cheaply made stuff dressed up"
Nope. I didn't say "a high end 300 watt amp sounds no different than a cheap 30 watter" or "An expensive TV performs no better than a budget model because it’s the basically the same thing dressed in fancy clothes". Actually.
Misrepresenting what I said is as bad as tossing out insults, IMO.
hifikrazy said:TrevC said:hifikrazy said:TrevC said:hifikrazy said:So a high end 300 watt amp sounds no different than a cheap 30 watter because they share some cheap electronic parts.
An expensive TV performs no better than a budget model because it’s the basically the same thing dressed in fancy clothes.
A Jag is no different than a Fiesta because both take their passengers from point A to B.
A mansion in The Hamptons is no different than a house in a Bombay slum because they’re just a roof over the head.
As a remedy for inferiority complex, I have to say it’s not actually a bad strategy to convince yourself of the above “truths”. I’m not materialistic and not saying that any of the above stuff really matters, but this kind of thinking is pure fantasy made up by people who feel the need to console themselves, and there seem to be quite a few hanging around this forum. Ironically they’re the ones accusing others of being delusional.
The above "truths" are strawmen arguments and not what was actually said at all.
The first two are directly credited to you actually.
"Expensive amplifiers can, and do, often use exactly the same parts as cheap ones because electronics is cheap. Those that do will invariable sound the same. "
"Of course the cheapie would probably be put in a cheap case and look rubbish, but that's beside the point. Much of the expensive stuff is cheaply made stuff dressed up"
Nope. I didn't say "a high end 300 watt amp sounds no different than a cheap 30 watter" or "An expensive TV performs no better than a budget model because it’s the basically the same thing dressed in fancy clothes". Actually.
Misrepresenting what I said is as bad as tossing out insults, IMO.
FWIW, expensive amplifiers are generally higher powered (hence the 300 watt example, although there are ultra expensive low powered SET amps) and cheaper ones tend to be lower powered hence the 30 watt illustration. I would apologise for misrepresenting you, but I don't think I am.
Your second quote was taken from a point you were making about plasma TVs... so again I don't think I'm misrepresenting you....IMO.