Glacialpath
New member
TrevC said:Glacialpath said:drag it down weather
It certainly is. Where did summer go?
LOL nice one Trev. I'm glad you read my posts carefully. Hehe. its is a bit dull out. I onder whether the sun will come out.
TrevC said:Glacialpath said:drag it down weather
It certainly is. Where did summer go?
nima said:TrevC said:nima said:Just put a sock in it (not aimed at OP).
Burn-in is a clever invention to dissuade people from immediately returning hifi equipment they dislike.
Homo unius libri
MajorFubar said:The scientific answer is 'no'. Any solid-state components not performing within tolerance at the point of manufacture are usually rejected by the component manufacturer. To take your example of a capacitor, the components'-manufacturers don't know if the capacitor they've made will end up in HiFi circuitry or in something more important, so there is no scope for them to take weeks or months to run-in before they work properly. "Sorry about your relative dying, only the electrolytic capacitors in his new dialysis machine were really meant for amps and DACs so they only work to spec after six months." Can you imagine the uproar. More likely you've got used to the different sound which was probably superior to your old one from the start but it took you a while to appreciate the difference.
T h e J u d g e said:How the salesman can keep a straight face when selling £1000 power cables (or any other sort of cable) is beyond me....
Glacialpath said:I'm not gullible, I trust my ears.
nima said:Glacialpath said:I'm not gullible, I trust my ears.
I'd say that would be the only reasonable thing to do, since most of us are using ears and brain to listen to music :boohoo: , not some sort of measuring equipment, military grade or not. Buying hi-fi to indulge oneself in some sort of measuring hobby :read: would be just silly.
:?
Cockroach said:I've learned something from this thread. Folks go on and on and on about how we should always audition kit before we buy. It's obviously complete b******s, because we can't trust our ears and brains to detect any differences. Therefore, we should all buy the cheapest of everything.
What amazes me most about this revelation is that it's often the same people who tell us to audiotion as also tell us not to trust our ears.
RobinKidderminster said:http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kzo45hWXRWU At the risk of repeating myself and possibly others our ears are a million miles from scientific instruments - our brains always get in the way. 'I can't believe my eyes' nor 'ears' is so very easy to illustrate.
T h e J u d g e said:How the salesman can keep a straight face when selling £1000 power cables (or any other sort of cable) is beyond me....
Glacialpath said:RobinKidderminster said:http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kzo45hWXRWU At the risk of repeating myself and possibly others our ears are a million miles from scientific instruments - our brains always get in the way. 'I can't believe my eyes' nor 'ears' is so very easy to illustrate.
What came first our ears and the ability to hear and desipher sound or the technology we created using our existing knowledge of sound and having to feed that knowledge into the new technology before it could understand what it's purpose was?
Oh hang on I thought of another great analogy for you. Submerines used to use Sonar to listen for othe ships/subs in the water but hang on that made a noise, what did they do when the wanted to stay silent.....? Oh hang on these guys would sit there with headphones on and could tell exactly what sounds were being heard, you've seen the movies I'm sure so you know what I'm talking about. Oh but before they would relay the message to the captain and the crew they would ping off a few Sonar pings just to be sure.....oh woops they get depth charged for making a sound, dam should have just stuck with trusting the guys ears.
Sorry mate science will only prove so much but until you feel, hear and see a train coming, will looking at a divice clearly stating there is a train coming will it actually be coming??????? Just thought I would throw that in for a laugh.
TrevC said:I never measure any hifi equipment. I agree, it's pointless.
davedotco said:Hugely entertaining......!
You really think sailors in billion pound submarines listen out for the enemy with their ears, too many WW2 movies for you......!
Next you'll be telling me that modern astronomers actually look through their telescopes........ :rofl:
You need to consider what you are saying....!
"The first law of holes", applies very strongly in this case...... :read:
Cockroach said:because we can't trust our ears and brains to detect any differences.
Cockroach said:Therefore, we should all buy the cheapest of everything.
pauln said:Cockroach said:because we can't trust our ears and brains to detect any differences.
True
Cockroach said:Therefore, we should all buy the cheapest of everything.
False
The conclusion does not follow the premise.
nima said:TrevC said:I never measure any hifi equipment. I agree, it's pointless.
Isn't that grand: some folks don't listen, they don't measure, they just know!
davedotco said:Hugely entertaining......!
You really think sailors in billion pound submarines listen out for the enemy with their ears, too many WW2 movies for you......!
Next you'll be telling me that modern astronomers actually look through their telescopes........ :rofl:
You need to consider what you are saying....!
"The first law of holes", applies very strongly in this case...... :read:
RobinKidderminster said:http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kzo45hWXRWU
pauln said:Cockroach said:because we can't trust our ears and brains to detect any differences.
True
Cockroach said:Therefore, we should all buy the cheapest of everything.
False
The conclusion does not follow the premise.
Glacialpath said:davedotco said:Hugely entertaining......!
You really think sailors in billion pound submarines listen out for the enemy with their ears, too many WW2 movies for you......!
Next you'll be telling me that modern astronomers actually look through their telescopes........ :rofl:
You need to consider what you are saying....!
"The first law of holes", applies very strongly in this case...... :read:
So Dave at what point did I mention modern submarines or suggest I was talking about anything other than WWII period subs and crews?
I must learn how to write so I sound clever because clearly I'm not.
Most Astronomers look through some kind of screen and don't look directly at the object the scope is pointed at. On a lesser scpoe you look through the eye piece looking at the morror reflecting the image and never down the scope itself. Come on next. What are youo sure I don't know?
Glacialpath said:I must learn how to write so I sound clever because clearly I'm not.
matt49 said:Glacialpath said:I must learn how to write so I sound clever because clearly I'm not.
It’s an unfortunate trend on the forum that some people seem to take pleasure in mocking those they think less intelligent or knowledgeable than themselves.
It’s all very childish and not even funny.
I disagree with you about cables, but I hope you stick to your guns.
Matt
RobinKidderminster said:Yet more analogies to smile at Cars, nuclear physics, meat & now sonar, submarines and astronomy. Can I compare thee to a summer's day?
The OP referred to burn in solid state - how these threads wander (lonely as a ....)
IMO ears are unreliable in comparitive situations and can easily be fooled. However, it seems sensible to audition over a short period if possible to ensure it sounds right.to our individual ears in our individual environments.
I also believe that science is the only way to determine differences in sound reproduction although those differences may or may not be audible.
I would like to know why 'burn-in' always IMPROVES sound never degrades it.
I say let science find the facts and then let our ears decide how those facts effect our hearing.
Must go - steaks to cook .....