professorhat said:Broner said:I don't see the moral progress in that. Dave's joke was as harmless as can be.
By today's standards, most people would agree with you (as indeed they seem to be doing). I suspect most people also felt the same way about racist jokes in the 70s.
Making the analogy is one thing, but whether it holds is entirely a different matter. Ethics isn't something entirely obscure and when it comes morality in the sense that it is the practical reality of proper ethical attitudes, it can actually be argued why change would be better or not. In this case, I fail to see why your type of change would make any ethical difference, as Dave's joke did not address the female sex in any way that could have been seen as degrading or offensive and didn't exploit a stereotype that you could plausibly link to the unequal position of women in society. There doesn't seem to be anything to improve upon.
The trouble is that it is often difficult to discern when something is actually morally problematic and, indeed, it often takes a while to make people see the truth of some things. But just saying[/b] that people make mysogynystic remarks and making analogies to racist jokes, doesn't automatically make one right.