steve_1979 said:Overdose said:Instead of fretting over tone controls, get a graphic equaliiser and be done, or for those with computer based systems, tweak the EQ to your hearts content.
Just don't pretend it's hi-fi.
While I totally agree with your comment I'd also like to play devils advocate. :twisted:
Say for example you have a badly mastered piece of music with too much treble and you use a graphic equaliser to make it sound more like the original instruments would sound when played. Could that be considered hi fidelity because it's closer to the original sound with the EQ than without?
The fidelity bit relates to the the recording on the disc as is. No-one is ever going to know how the original recording sounded or the individual tracks separately recorded, so regardless of how bad the recording, trying to make it sound better, or what you percieve to be correct, is guesswork at best. The closer to a flat frequency response you go, the higher fidelity the system. To make the playback more to your liking is absolutely fine, but tweaking the output to better satisfy your personal tastes is altering the sound and therefore deviates from that fidelity.
Some people wouldn't like the taste of a neat spirit and so add a mixer. That's fine, but what you end up with might be a rusty nail, as opposed to a fine twelve year old malt, which are entirely different things. If you start off with a rusty nail, It'll be a bit difficult to then turn it back into that single malt.