MeanandGreen
Well-known member
If it dictates a person's choice of amp then I reckon they're unnecessarily limiting (and possibly compromising) their options - perhaps missing out on an overall better sounding amp - for the sake of correcting the odd wrongly recorded track.
But I understand that some people can't be without tone controls 😐
I’m not really a user of tone controls, but I do see the benefits for some situations.
I reckon most audiophiles could save a lot of tail chasing, component swapping and expenditure - if they weren’t brainwashed into thinking a tone control circuit was destroying the signal. Thinking that somehow their set up is not audiophile enough if they feel the need to tweak bass and treble up or down by a couple of db.
Music genres vary, recordings and mastering vary, peoples room acoustics vary, peoples ears vary etc…
Yet the audiophile cult says tone controls should be banished from any decent system, but it’s perfectly acceptable to swap around interconnects, speaker cables etc as if to use those as a means of tonal balance adjustment instead. 😂
Where is the logic?