bigboss said:
theflyingwasp said:You know your stuff BB I'm sure whatever you settle on will look and sound great ......hell of a deal with the ZT tho throw in a cheeky wee calibration and your good to go!
Don't tell us that deal hasn't threw a spanner in the works 🙂 greatest 1080p TV ever made at £1700 less than the samsung!
strapped for cash said:AV Forums' review doesn't make much sense to me.
A TV that reaches down to just 0.09 cd/m2 (MLL) is described as delivering "great blacks," yet last year's Sony and Samsung high end LED models managed 0.05 cd/m2. In other words, the HU8500's black level (ANSI) isn't even impressive by LED standards.
As always, the proof is in the watching rather than the numbers, but it's hard to imagine the TV producing images that don't look at least a little washed out.
David@FrankHarvey said:I've never got the curved screen thing for TVs. Firstly, the whole of the screen of a TV is in focus. Secondly, it narrows the viewing angle, and thirdly, unless you're sitting close enough to be at the focal point of the curve, you'll get no benefit whatsoever!
bigboss said:strapped for cash said:AV Forums' review doesn't make much sense to me.
A TV that reaches down to just 0.09 cd/m2 (MLL) is described as delivering "great blacks," yet last year's Sony and Samsung high end LED models managed 0.05 cd/m2. In other words, the HU8500's black level (ANSI) isn't even impressive by LED standards.
As always, the proof is in the watching rather than the numbers, but it's hard to imagine the TV producing images that don't look at least a little washed out.
Check their very next sentence:
"The Samsung includes their Smart LED local dimming feature and unsurprisingly when activated the measured black levels reduced to 0.01cd/m2 in the low and standard settings and 0cd/m2 in the high setting."
Son_of_SJ said:David@FrankHarvey said:I've never got the curved screen thing for TVs. Firstly, the whole of the screen of a TV is in focus. Secondly, it narrows the viewing angle, and thirdly, unless you're sitting close enough to be at the focal point of the curve, you'll get no benefit whatsoever!
Sorry David, I'm certainly with you in spirit on this one, I think that curved TVs are for people with NO FRIENDS, because the sweet spot is apparently not wide enough to accommodate even two people! However, in the context of the rest of what you say, is there a word or words missing from your second sentence, which I've put in bold? :?
strapped for cash said:bigboss said:strapped for cash said:AV Forums' review doesn't make much sense to me.
A TV that reaches down to just 0.09 cd/m2 (MLL) is described as delivering "great blacks," yet last year's Sony and Samsung high end LED models managed 0.05 cd/m2. In other words, the HU8500's black level (ANSI) isn't even impressive by LED standards.
As always, the proof is in the watching rather than the numbers, but it's hard to imagine the TV producing images that don't look at least a little washed out.
Check their very next sentence:
"The Samsung includes their Smart LED local dimming feature and unsurprisingly when activated the measured black levels reduced to 0.01cd/m2 in the low and standard settings and 0cd/m2 in the high setting."
Yes, but to my knowledge, the TV uses "edge lit local dimming" rather than full array local dimming. It's not at all clear whether the 0.01 cd/m2 figure has any bearing on what happens when the TV is displaying content.
The 0 cd/m2 figure certainly doesn't, since no LED TV (even the best full array local dimming models) can do this. The only televisions to date to manage a genuine 0 cd/m2 reading are OLED models.
The ANSI figure is the one to look at. If the TV could produce 0.01 cd/m2 (or an absolute black reading of 0 cd/m2) when lit pixels are displayed, these figures should be reflected in the ANSI graphic.
strapped for cash said:To add to the above, this prototype Panasonic uses full array local dimming and has 4K native resolution:
http://www.trustedreviews.com/panasonic-studio-master-4k-lcd_TV_review
Off axis viewing still seems to be a problem, as with all LED TVS, but on axis this appears to compete with outgoing plasma models in terms of MLL.
It's also more futureproof, given the resolution, though I still have my doubts about 4K's benefits in the near future, and on anything smaller than a 55" screen.
bigboss said:I'm only giving you the rationale for AV forums' comment about "good blacks". My understanding is that Samsung uses a clever tech to produce deeper blacks which can improve picture quality.
bigboss said:BUT it's a Panasonic. 🙂
bigboss said:Son_of_SJ said:I think that curved TVs are for people with NO FRIENDS, because the sweet spot is apparently not wide enough to accommodate even two people!
I would disagree with you on this. When I demoed curved TVs, I walked around to extreme angles. It was only at extreme angles that there was significant distortion.
strapped for cash said:bigboss said:BUT it's a Panasonic. 🙂
It's not a plasma, though.![]()
And with full array local dimming, there should be no issues with backlight uniformity.
None of that excuses Panasonic's customer service history. Hopefully the TV will work properly, meaning calls to Panasonic CS won't be needed. I'm not assuming anything here. It could be a disaster in the making.
Nevertheless, of all 2014 TVs, this one has me most excited, after any OLED models LG might introduce.