Andrewjvt said:
davedotco said:
The classic 15 inch bass and compression driver system derives from systems built in the 1930s for the cinema. Home hi-fi, as we know it, did not exist until after WW2.
This is a huge subject, but the advent of electric instruments in the late 50s required a more powerful speaker for recording studios, so many studios used the Altec A7 theatre system as a studio monitor.
Few of the theatre systems, even the compact 604 based setup, were ideal, which lead to the production of the JBL 4320, the first purpose built studio monitor. This design used (possibly) the finest 15 inch driver ever built, the 2215, running to 800Hz, the rest of the range was covered by the 2420 compression driver with a short conical horn.
The M2 is a direct descendant of this design, the criteria has swung away from the more complex 3 and 4 way systems and back to the classic 2 way, with all of it's dynamic 'purity'. I have not heard the M2s but I have a pretty good idea of how they will sound.
Trust me on this, most of you will not like them.
Can you explain in a little more detail why people would not like them?
I used to to have PA with horn and 12 inch mids with 15 inch bass bins and i loved the sound. I never even gave any thought of pa and hifi etc if you know what i mean
You may or may not be unusual, but speaker systems of this type do not sit comfortably with most hi-fi enthusiasts.
The reason is simple enough, the whole emphasis of the design is different, dynamic range, transient response and shear 'presence' are what these speakers are all about.
The 'artifice' of warmth, low colouration (very 1980s terminology) and a 'smooth' sound is simply not present, instruments and bands are rendered in a stark, almost raw manner, not at all smoothed over by the usual constraints of modern hi-fi, let alone the big, fat wooly sounds of decades past.
Like or dislike are of course personal, but real instruments, live or in the studio tell me what is most realistic, and it isn't the hi-fi.