Vladimir said:
Sugden A21SE vs. NAD C 356BEE.
Which one is a better amplifier and why?
Out of the two I'd choose the NAD. I've no experience with Sugden, but the quoted specs for it are a bit vague and very poor for the price IMO.
I do admit I'm biased towards NAD amps.
High power & low distortion at 20hz-20Khz both channels driven, good S/N, much more flexable conectivity with more inputs, plus a digital input (with the optional DAC module), headphone jack, bypassable tone controls, the usual pre/power conectivity (I know the Sugden has that too), but the NAD gives pretty much everything you could ask for in an amplifer. All it lacks is a phono stage, but NAD make separate ones anyway.
NAD tells you what the power consumption is, Sugden don't as far as I can see.
Sugden also don't quote the THD and they don't tell you how they measured the 30W output. Yes at 8 ohms with both channels, but at what frequency range and with how much distortion?
Personally I wouldn't even consider the Sugden. £2400 for the on paper specs I've just read, no thanks!