El Hefe said:Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing.
Brilliant. A career in stand up awaits.
El Hefe said:Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing.
BenLaw said:El Hefe said:Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing.
Brilliant. A career in stand up awaits.
But there is a clear right and wrong re this subject. Digital cables have no effect on sound quality. Explaining so is clearly right, whereas suggesting otherwise is clearly wrong.El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:Surely the best way to help the OP avoid spending an extreme amount of money unnecessarily, is to explain to him/her that USB cables can have no effect on audio quality? Advising he/she demoes different USB cables and decides for him/herself whether any sound different is only going to confuse, and set the stage for expectation bias, which most likely will lead to unnecessary spending.El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:I strongly disagree. I think the best advice is the truth, which is that digital cables have nothing to do with audio/video quality beyond them actually working, or not. There's no such thing as a better one in terms of performance, so why borrow one? What would one be deciding on?paradiziac said:El Hefe said:And the main advice above is actually borrow and decide by yourself...
+1
Borrow because the question by OP is related to cost of the cable.... To avoid him spending extreme amount of money unnecesarily.
This is hifi and music. Make a decision base on what one hears, not based on what other people hear, or whatever a 6 page long thread on 1s and 0s discussion trying to prove or whatever a review says. YMYD.
Yes this is hifi and music, and people should make decisions based on what they hear, but they should also know what can effect sound quality and what can't, so they know what's worth demoing and what isn't.
USB cables are not worth demoing because they have no effect on sound quality.
Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing. When it comes to pleasure of music, I rather one to trust their own ears eventhough there is white paper by Albert Einstein himself saying the opposite.
And its for the OP to take any advices with a pinch of salt. This is not a textbook exercise of which there is a clear right or wrong.
Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
BenLaw said:El Hefe said:Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing.
Brilliant. A career in stand up awaits.
professorhat said:BenLaw said:El Hefe said:Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing.
Brilliant. A career in stand up awaits.
Or middle management
Hookyspud said:El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:But there is a clear right and wrong re this subject. Digital cables have no effect on sound quality. Explaining so is clearly right, whereas suggesting otherwise is clearly wrong.paradiziac said:
Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing. When it comes to pleasure of music, I rather one to trust their own ears eventhough there is white paper by Albert Einstein himself saying the opposite.
And its for the OP to take any advices with a pinch of salt. This is not a textbook exercise of which there is a clear right or wrong.
Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
There is no clear right and wrong on the subject. One party says one thing and the other says the opposite. Both parties try to show their evidence and yet both parties are not authoritive enough nor in the industry and engineering or science. And now you say digital cables, not only USB have no effect on sound quality. Good for you to be one of those who can accept that. It sometimes can be a curse on people that feels the opposite.
Hence, thats why I always go back to listening rather than solely relying on reviews and thoughts.
Trefor Patten said:Idiots about in both the 'makes no difference' and 'this cable has changed my life' camps.
El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:But there is . Digital cables have no effect on audio/video quality. That is a fact, it's the truth, and it's clearly right to inform people of that fact.El Hefe said:Hookyspud said:But there is a clear right and wrong re this subject. Digital cables have no effect on sound quality. Explaining so is clearly right, whereas suggesting otherwise is clearly wrong.paradiziac said:
Knowing more sometimes can be more confusing. When it comes to pleasure of music, I rather one to trust their own ears eventhough there is white paper by Albert Einstein himself saying the opposite.
And its for the OP to take any advices with a pinch of salt. This is not a textbook exercise of which there is a clear right or wrong.
Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
There is no clear right and wrong on the subject. One party says one thing and the other says the opposite. Both parties try to show their evidence and yet both parties are not authoritive enough nor in the industry and engineering or science. And now you say digital cables, not only USB have no effect on sound quality. Good for you to be one of those who can accept that. It sometimes can be a curse on people that feels the opposite.
Hence, thats why I always go back to listening rather than solely relying on reviews and thoughts.
El Hefe said:Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
So even though nothings changed, it sounds different? I'd call that a good reason not to trust your ears! :doh:
Hookyspud said:But there is . Digital cables have no effect on audio/video quality. That is a fact, it's the truth, and it's clearly right to inform people of that fact.
El Hefe said:Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
So even though nothings changed, it sounds different? I'd call that a good reason not to trust your ears! :doh:
Not to trust your ears? Then why even bother listening to music?
Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
So even though nothings changed, it sounds different? I'd call that a good reason not to trust your ears! :doh:
Not to trust your ears? Then why even bother listening to music?
To enjoy it, not pick it apart wondering if I can hear a difference with some stupid cable. My point was if the same system can sound different when it isn't, how can you trust yourself to know if a difference you hear is real or not? I think I'll bow out of this one though and leave you and some of the others fretting about cables, I'll go back to what I was doing earlier - enjoying some music.
But there can't be. It is not possible.El Hefe said:Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Craig M. said:El Hefe said:Play a track today and play it again next week without changing anything in your set up. I will be surprised if there isn't even a slight different in sound.
So even though nothings changed, it sounds different? I'd call that a good reason not to trust your ears! :doh:
Not to trust your ears? Then why even bother listening to music?
To enjoy it, not pick it apart wondering if I can hear a difference with some stupid cable. My point was if the same system can sound different when it isn't, how can you trust yourself to know if a difference you hear is real or not? I think I'll bow out of this one though and leave you and some of the others fretting about cables, I'll go back to what I was doing earlier - enjoying some music.
Thats my point all along...to the OP at least... try it out...if there is no different in sound.. so be it....Enjoy the music... if there is, fortunate/unfortunate for the OP...depending how the OP takes it...
And my analogy about listening to the track is that....even without any changes made on your set up...no 2 different occasions that the music you listen to will sound 100% the same....
But yes...that is on useful advice...Enjoy the music...and not hifi...
No, I didn't say that.bigboss said:I don't get this. Are you saying that if my friend supports the English cricket team (as me), then I should be happy about his support for Manchester United (when I support Man City), simply because we both support the same team in cricket?
ifor said:I found this interesting. I assume Mr Roth looks forward to / hopes for favourable reviews for his products from the WHF reviewing team, but with comment he's effectively said that we can't trust WHF reviews. A bit of a Gerald Ratner moment methinks.ROTH AV said:An audible difference between USB cables ?
Really ?
Laughed so hard my bum bled.
pauln said:To all those who believe that they have golden ears; click on the link at the bottom of Craig M's post then scroll down until you get to the link to the McGurk effect and watch it. Your ears lie to you most of the time.
NwAvGuy has a similar attitude to Alan Shaw (Harbeth) - he is an engineer who does not believe the HiFi myths and like AS he can provide plenty of evidence to back up his beliefs.
I think what most people here are trying to do is to prevent people wasting a lot money on things that make no difference.
"Let your ears decide" is possibly the worst advice to give anyone.
ROTH AV said:However, to suggest that anyone on this planet can actually hear a difference between 'audio' (actually, data) carried by USB cables is for me, in all probability, unlikely. I tend to deal with science and facts. For me, what is relevant is what is happening at either end of the USB cable. I kind of know about this stuff.
ifor said:No, I didn't say that.bigboss said:I don't get this. Are you saying that if my friend supports the English cricket team (as me), then I should be happy about his support for Manchester United (when I support Man City), simply because we both support the same team in cricket?
andyjm said:then I think that there is a chance that poor quality cables MAY be able to impact the sound quality.
ROTH AV said:In answer to andyjm (as he asked me a direct question) - with a poor quality cable there may be compromised audio reproduction - totally agree with you. There may be some annoying 'noise' that is caused by poor manufacturing, but in my opinion, there would be no change in tonal quality. If there was any change in tonal quality it is highly unlikely (again, in my personal opinion) that the human ear would be capable of detecting this.
if alan shaw don't believe in wires ,why he in anniversary model shl5 speakers changed wires to expensive ones ?pauln said:To all those who believe that they have golden ears; click on the link at the bottom of Craig M's post then scroll down until you get to the link to the McGurk effect and watch it. Your ears lie to you most of the time.
NwAvGuy has a similar attitude to Alan Shaw (Harbeth) - he is an engineer who does not believe the HiFi myths and like AS he can provide plenty of evidence to back up his beliefs.
I think what most people here are trying to do is to prevent people wasting a lot money on things that make no difference.
"Let your ears decide" is possibly the worst advice to give anyone.