Vincent Kars
Well-known member
If it has been a unsighted test, you are spot on.If the OP can hear a difference that's all that matters surely?
If it has been a sighted test the OP has "seen" a difference, not to be mistaken for hearing one.
If it has been a unsighted test, you are spot on.If the OP can hear a difference that's all that matters surely?
I Agree 👍So you would you rather they were just misled?
I genuinely feel sorry for any new members coming here looking for advice...
Sighted or not if the OP thinks he can hear a difference who are we to argue.If it has been a unsighted test, you are spot on.
If it has been a sighted test the OP has "seen" a difference, not to be mistaken for hearing one.
Anyone looking for advice would not be looking at this thread the state it's in...I Agree 👍
The only way to decide is to try for yourself and make your own mind up.Most new forum members come on here looking for answers not just ' you can't possibly hear a difference' approach .
Its not informative and its not interesting.
No, l didn't mean that.You mean new members or old members or any member won't profit by knowing the difference between a sighted and a unsighted test?
Exactly what knowledge are they going to get from this thread pray?Any knowledge for new members or old has too be a bonus and experince and learning curb thats the fun of it !
That maybe there is no consensus therefore the best course of action is to try them out for themselves and make their own minds up !Exactly what knowledge are they going to get from this thread pray?
On this thread there's one person's opinion and that is the OPs.That maybe there is no consensus therefore the best course of action is to try them out for themselves and make their own minds up !
I hear you and it is music to my ears!I am glad you said "to my ears" as I am one who is unconvinced of an audio difference in digital cables.
I do wonder if you are hearing a perceived difference on an actual difference.
Are you swayed by the fact that you know which cable you are listening to?
It could be a placebo effect or there really is a difference
Now I have tried a few analogue cables (speaker and inter-connect) and cannot tell a difference (My ears? possibly))
But this has left me a cynic when it comes to cables (most definitely digital)
I am thinking that due the difference in inductance, capacitance and resistance of analogue cables, would affect the sound but I think the effect is more subtle that people realise.
OK... back to digital cables and USB in this case.
I believe that a digital signal is error free or not.
If error free, we get a nice clean signal.
If there are errors. Then we get pops/clicks
None of this increased bass/smoother mid-range talk.
Wanna convince me..... or how do I convince myself.
I think only a blind listening test would do that.
Probable goes for most people as well.
If one knows what cable/piece of equipment they are listening to. I think the person would be biased as to what they are hearing.
Then again you do say that you hear a difference.
Perhaps you have better ears
I hear you and it is music to my ears!
The sonic merits of different USB cables is up for debate.
My acid test is my wife, one needs to be assured one isn't going bonkers!
She assures me the sound appears more energised with the Chord cables but isn't night or day, it's supple
. Or she could just be patronising me. Yeah its lovely, please shut up
Cables is something, you build around your system.
Some topics can make moderators' life harder. Understandable. Disallowing certain kinds of discussions because of that is ridiculous though.I think the reason why Al has felt the need to chip in is that cable threads can be relied upon in two ways:
1) People say the same things, repeatedly, and
2) They become gradually but increasingly polarised/ill-tempered and/or patronising.
In those respects, newcomers are more likely to pay attention to the manner in which people express themselves and draw conclusions about the poster than they are about the subject in question.
If it were up to me, I'd just have a single sticky thread where people could say what they thought - once and once only, no replies, no commenting on others' posts etc.
Maybe have a new section on the forum dedicated to cables then the moderators could simply move all cable threads to this section ?I think the reason why Al has felt the need to chip in is that cable threads can be relied upon in two ways:
1) People say the same things, repeatedly, and
2) They become gradually but increasingly polarised/ill-tempered and/or patronising.
In those respects, newcomers are more likely to pay attention to the manner in which people express themselves and draw conclusions about the poster than they are about the subject in question.
If it were up to me, I'd just have a single sticky thread where people could say what they thought - once and once only, no replies, no commenting on others' posts etc.
No-one is talking about disallowing them - just wishing they weren't so predictable.Some topics can make moderators' life harder. Understandable. Disallowing certain kinds of discussions because of that is ridiculous though.
Thank you for your inciteful comments, well that's it then, let's close shop.It really isn't.
Ah, the faithful wife. Haven't seen this one trotted out in years.
Or, It didn't happen, or she's humouring you...
No it isn't.
I'm only surprised you haven't lobbed in "you need a resolving enough system to appreciate the difference" for good measure...
The shop is open 24/7, forever.let's close shop.
To be fair, he had generous help from the cavalry, who came in early on to keep the peace.Seems to me that the OP here is unusually realistic and reasonable about the response he knew he was going to get.
What are the "facts" regarding USB cables ?The original OP was just stating his belief that USB cables do make a difference in their opinion , not that it was undeniable fact.
This is perfectly fine as everyone is entitled to their opinion.
The problem only occurs when opinion is touted as fact, and doing so requires verifiable evidence or the claim is meaningless.
Bill
Blocking interference in the cable improves the signal quality. All transmission is liable to be corrupted and that is why there is the concept of acknowledging reception of network packages in TCP/IP and getting corrupt files on the Internet is rare.What are the "facts" regarding USB cables ?