I think the first one is significantly better personally. A bit more texture to the story, whereas ll is a little bit crash bang wallop, for me at least. If you haven't seen the first, I think you'll like it.
I still find it hard to believe Cary Grant was born in Bristol!The Amazing Quest of Ernest Bliss -- DVD -- Cary Grant in a good, old-fashioned moral tale. Still holds up today.
While I’m all for watching foreign films in their native language with subtitles, I occasionally watch the odd foreign language movie with English dubbing in order to look at the film more.Spirited Away on blu ray - absolutely beautiful - so much so that I watch with dubbed voices rather than subtitles. Quite why children in animation have to have such grating voices is beyond me, but it doesn't spoil it at all.
It’s one of those films that you needed to see during the video nasty era. I’m not sure it has the same impact for those watching it a decade or more later. Even though most of the effects and make-up are quite ropey nowadays, I remember watching it for the first time on Betamax after my dad rented it out for me. I was about 12/13.The Evil Dead on blu ray - still not quite sure what I make of it - it's certainly scary...
No, I mean the original. Some of the effects really are pretty suspect it's true, but there's certainly a pervasive sense of menace - it's this that makes it work for me, I think. I'll be interested to see what my 21y/o daughter made of it when we have a debrief!It’s one of those films that you needed to see during the video nasty era. I’m not sure it has the same impact for those watching it a decade or more later. Even though most of the effects and make-up are quite ropey nowadays, I remember watching it for the first time on Betamax after my dad rented it out for me. I was about 12/13.
The last couple of times I’ve watched it I did so in black and white, as I think it really suits the film, and the make-up doesn’t look as bad.
Censor is a recent film with video nasty era themes, about a film censor in the early 80s working on a film which is obviously influenced by Evil Dead.
Or did you mean the reboot from almost 10 years ago?
For someone who wasn’t even born in the same century as Evil Dead, I can’t see them appreciating it like people who witnessed it on release. I think it has to be a genre that is followed and studied by a younger individual to really get what it had in its day.No, I mean the original. Some of the effects really are pretty suspect it's true, but there's certainly a pervasive sense of menace - it's this that makes it work for me, I think. I'll be interested to see what my 21y/o daughter made of it when we have a debrief!
I'd heard good things about Censor.
You might want to look at the release dates for those... The slow drip of good sci-fi doesn't seem to be getting any faster. It's a pet peeve of mine as a sci-fi lover. Of the 20 highest grossing films of all time, something like 7 of them are sci-fi. Yet the movie business can barely turn out one good sci-fi movie a yearSource Code last night - there's been some good SF in the last few years - Moon, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049 etc etc.
I did realise I was perhaps stretching the definition of few years, but there have been some significant droughts!You might want to look at the release dates for those... The slow drip of good sci-fi doesn't seem to be getting any faster. It's a pet peeve of mine as a sci-fi lover. Of the 20 highest grossing films of all time, something like 7 of them are sci-fi. Yet the movie business can barely turn out one good sci-fi movie a year
Revolt -- Blu-Ray -- Marmite low budget sci-fi action movie. Has a lot of problems but also does a lot with its budget.
To me, Villeneuve's Dune was boring as hell. I love the book but, to be fair, it's probably impossible to make an interesting film from it. Villeneuve tried and lots of people like it so maybe it's just me.Not seen Dune yet, but Villeneuve’s on a roll.
I think there’s been so much crappy sci-fi stuff produced that studios don’t take a sci-fi film seriously unless there’s some major names behind it. The image these crappy sci-fi films create for the genre I think affects the public’s perception of a sci-fi release at the cinema, and many might skip it thinking it’s going to be the usual rubbish. And then there’s the modern, typical big blockbuster sci-fi equivalent to the likes of Armageddon (OTT nonsense), like Roland Emmerich’s recent effort, Moonfall - which I haven’t seen yet, but the trailer just reminded me of those types of films, so I don’t really want to see it. Give me Duncan Jones’ Moon any day of the week over stuff like that.
It's probably just a preference thing. Put on a movie about sports and I'll lose interest in the same way.People who don't like SF think that rubbish SF is all there is, and that somehow stuff with characterisation and subtlety somehow isn't SF. Their loss.
As bad as 2012 is, I actually quite enjoy watching it. Sort of a guilty pleasure of mine…that’s not going to make me watch Moonfall though..Moonfall... From the director who gave us 2012... That'll be an assertive No from me.
Yeah, got CargoIf you like Moon, have you watched Cargo? Similar budget.
He means the sci-fi one, not the virus/zombie one.There's more than one film called Cargo - which one?
Watched Close Encounters on 4k last night - still too long, and too boring at the end as a result. Oh well...
The German one. Speaking of Germans...There's more than one film called Cargo - which one?
I read the book before watching the film and, despite the book being based on the film, rather than the other way round, after I enjoyed the book, the film was a disappointment.Watched Close Encounters on 4k last night - still too long, and too boring at the end as a result. Oh well...