In that case, I'd probably go with the first system, as subtly integrating a Sub can be problematical....but it has to be your preference.inbox4 said:R500s work really well in this room.
The room has needed some accoustic treatment to accomodate them but is great now.
inbox4 said:I think I may have mislead responses by mentioning the room size.
I currently have R500s in this room without an issue. They sound wonderful and I rate them highly. If they work then the significantly smaller LS50w certainly would too.
I am having problems with my Mac Mini and wondered how the LS50w would compare if I were to sell the whole system. I think the LS50w would need a sub to keep up with the R500s though.
I agree.inbox4 said:The LS50 gets universally outstanding reviews (app excepted) and I've been wondering whether it would be an all together simpler solution - with exceptional performance.
inbox4 said:Headless Macs are a pain and wth the new problems with screen sharing I'm experiencing, I've had enough of mine.The LS50 gets universally outstanding reviews (app excepted) and I've been wondering whether it would be an all together simpler solution - with exceptional performance.
Exactly what I was thinking. I’d try the LS50s and pass on the sub.CnoEvil said:I agree.inbox4 said:The LS50 gets universally outstanding reviews (app excepted) and I've been wondering whether it would be an all together simpler solution - with exceptional performance.
Are you sure you would need a Sub? The LS50s have surprising scale, if placed on decent, filled stands....especially in a small room.
inbox4 said:Thanks for the suggestion but the AVI speakers wouldn't allow me to replace my Mac Mini as a source like the LS50w would. That is my aim.