FrankHarveyHiFi: According to many on this site, they've chosen a good player to base theirs on. Lexicon then have to write their own software, beef up the chassis, manufacture a case and facia (and lets face it, not many manufacturers can match Lexicon when it comes to build quality), send for THX approval, and pay a license to THX, as well as other licenses. Building in America, like the UK, is far more expensive than it is in whatever country the Oppo is built in. Lexicon's do provide an excellent back up service too.
It is not based on the Oppo it is the Oppo.
They have added their own splash screen and it will update from Lexicon`s website not Oppo`s, does that count as writing their own software. They have not beefed up the chasis they have droped it into their case, the chasis, component layout, components, are all identical. "Manufacture a case and facia", yes a aluminuminum case and facia complete with a bit of dark blue tinted plastic is going to cost thousands. "Lexicon`s do provide an excellent back up service" I believe they are offering a 3 year warranty as opposed to Oppos 1 year warranty, for software upgrades I would be amazed if they are not just going to use Oppos slightly altered for Lexicon splash screen, for warranty replacement and repair I would expect excellent service considering the profit margin.
"Building in America, like the UK, is far more expensive than it is in whatever country the Oppo is built in" They are both manufactured by Oppos parent company BBK in the Far East. Final assembly in the USA can be cheaper than importing finished products due to higher import duties. To display a made in America logo in America, a product has to consisting of 51% or more of domestically produced or manufactured parts, labor and or value-added content or any combination thereof. They certainly appear to have added more than 51% value to the product.
At least one hi-end manufacture that upgrades an Oppo, buys finished Oppo players in bulk and disassembles them, this is apparantly cheaper than getting the manufacture to run a small <1000 unit run, and avoids having to pay royalities to DVD and Blu-ray consortium members as they have already been paid by the original manufacture on completed goods. This hi-end manufacture unlike Lexicon is at least open as to exactly what they do and what modifications they do to the player and how they believe those modifications improve performance and add value.
THX has dropped all reference to the Lexicon on their website. The it fails to meet THX spec was based on its audio analogue outputs but apparantly THX do not test these on Blu-ray players. So it passes THX spec. Problem with THX is the rigorous tests to insure products meet their high specifications. THX will not disclose what tests are performed or what their high specifications are. So THX certification is primarily a marketing logo, that has no defined meaning or spec the consumer can look up, just like the Joe Kane of Digital Video Essentials likes it statement.
I agree it is not uncommon, but it is not usually so blatant they usually alter a bit of the internals, to attempt to justify their claims of vast improved performance and cost. But I have read of several other examples over the years of hi-end manufactures just replacing the case and branding and price tag. So it has happened before and no doubt will happen again. Lexicon primarily sell to custom installers who provide their customers with expert advice and complete home cinema solutions, so alot of the price tag is going to be dealer markup.