Classe amplification

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.

Neuphonix

New member
Apr 20, 2012
9
0
0
Visit site
[/quote]

I am glad you liked the Electro ECI3 , it's not bad for the entry level amp in the classic range is it :) .

The sweetness you mention does reduce slightly when the amp has been in use for a few hours, the sound becomes faster and more detailed with more pronounced dynamic swings and greater focus, depth and layering of the soundstage.

There are two versions of the ECI5 , the original that is unfortunately now discontinued which was really just a much more powerful version of the ECI3, and the ECI5 MK2 that sounds slightly more forward and has a less sweet and dark presentation .

The ECI3 can compete with some very exotic equipment as you have heard :)

[/quote]

Not bad is probably selling it a bit short :) For basically the same money as the M6i, it utterly wiped the floor.

We were a little rushed for time so didn't get a chance to listen to the ECI5. If the characteristics are as you describe, perhaps that would suit my taste more. I think after having lived with the AMS sound for a year or so now, I have become a bit of a snob.

But my friend was completely sold on the ECI3 sound, he couldn't stop talking about it. The one aspect that he didn't like was the styling, bit too 80's for him.

He has a few decisions to make, depending on how far his budget can be stretched.

1) Buy my ASM35P & a Linn Majik DSM / Naim Uniti to use as a preamp / source.

2) Buy an Electro ECI3 or 5 & decide on a source.

Both avenues have pros & cons, but I really feel that option 1 is slightly better.

Any thoughts on the use of the Linn or Naim as a pre-amp?
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
Neuphonix said:
Not bad is probably selling it a bit short :) For basically the same money as the M6i, it utterly wiped the floor.

We were a little rushed for time so didn't get a chance to listen to the ECI5. If the characteristics are as you describe, perhaps that would suit my taste more. I think after having lived with the AMS sound for a year or so now, I have become a bit of a snob.

But my friend was completely sold on the ECI3 sound, he couldn't stop talking about it. The one aspect that he didn't like was the styling, bit too 80's for him.

He has a few decisions to make, depending on how far his budget can be stretched.

1) Buy my ASM35P & a Linn Majik DSM / Naim Uniti to use as a preamp / source.

2) Buy an Electro ECI3 or 5 & decide on a source.

Both avenues have pros & cons, but I really feel that option 1 is slightly better.

Any thoughts on the use of the Linn or Naim as a pre-amp?

I like the M6i, but prefer my AVR600 (and the Electro / Sugden).

The AMS sound does make one very fussy, as terms like warm, bright, smooth, forward, detailed, just become redundant......as it just sounds."right".

The Linn has quite a good Pre, but I have no idea about the Naim. This is a real trial and error one....option 1 looks better on paper, but would need tried.

How's the AMS50 going....much of an improvement?.....I bet the Refs are lapping up the extra current! :rockout:
 

Neuphonix

New member
Apr 20, 2012
9
0
0
Visit site
Yes I'm writing up the for & against for both the Linn & the naim. One has a CD player (Uniti2) one has HDMI in/out (Majik), not really sure why you need either TBH. The Linn phono stage is another plus. Also, as I am familiar with the Linn set-up I can prob be of greater assistance to him.

The Unitilite does look promising though given the price difference, esp as we wont be using the amp.

Still at my friends house until next Tuesday, so nothing more to offer on the AMS50 yet. I'll have to be content with listening to his AMS50 / Diablos and raiding his cellar while I do so.

Does feel a bit weird though, having such a nice new toy at home set-up & ready to go, but not being there to use it.
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
Neuphonix said:
Yes I'm writing up the for & against for both the Linn & the naim. One has a CD player (Uniti2) one has HDMI in/out (Majik), not really sure why you need either TBH. The Linn phono stage is another plus. Also, as I am familiar with the Linn set-up I can prob be of greater assistance to him.

The Unitilite does look promising though given the price difference, esp as we wont be using the amp.

Still at my friends house until next Tuesday, so nothing more to offer on the AMS50 yet. I'll have to be content with listening to his AMS50 / Diablos and raiding his cellar while I do so.

Does feel a bit weird though, having such a nice new toy at home set-up & ready to go, but not being there to use it.

Am I right in thinking the Naim needs an Apple product to operate it (or am I making this up), whereas Linn works with just about everything?

The Majik DSM on its own sounds great with Kef R Series....I was very surprised, and that doesn't happen often.

I also suggest you have a listen to the LS50s, with a decent amp and a DS....just out of academic interest. :shifty:
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
Neuphonix said:
.Still at my friends house until next Tuesday, so nothing more to offer on the AMS50 yet. I'll have to be content with listening to his AMS50 / Diablos and raiding his cellar while I do so.

Does feel a bit weird though, having such a nice new toy at home set-up & ready to go, but not being there to use it.

:poke: Spill! :? :)
 

Neuphonix

New member
Apr 20, 2012
9
0
0
Visit site
Well, been home for a week now & the first thing that I will say is that my brief flirtation with the idea of buying a TT is over. The Akurate just sounds superior to my ears.

Also, how glad I am to have moved away from the Diablos. As fine as they do sound, the Refs just wipe the floor. It was worthwhile to have had a couple of weeks to remind me of the differences between the two.

OK, onto the 50P. Bear in mind I did not do any side by side comparisons, the units are just too heavy to be able to easily set them up together. God the 50P is a beast, have had some difficulty in rearranging my rack to fit it in, not something I want to be moving around too often. Have ordered a nice thick granite tablet to place to amp on, it's way to heavy to go into the rack.

Got to say that there is not a massive difference, presentation is obviously very similar. I am definitely left with the impression that the Refs do appreciate the extra juice though, they just seem to be more controlled, stop & start on a dime.

This is most apparent in the lower end, before there was a slight wooliness in the low to mid bass, this is now significantly reduced. I do wonder if the room is the greater contributor in this regard than the amp?

So if I was to put a subjective % figure on the improvement to the system I would say 12.7562%. :?

If I had had the opportunity to do a home demo prior to purchase I may not have bothered. But once I move the 35P on the changeover will have been manageable, so all in all pretty happy.

So you should probably be content with the 35i, while I don't doubt stepping up would improve things for you the difference is not night and day.

I'm dissapointed that the Klimax purchase didn't work out, I would have thought that the two in tandem would have added up to a pretty significant overall lift.

BTW I have also just added one of these into the system: http://thortechnologies.com.au/products/product/ps10-smart-power-station

Can't say that I noticed any difference to SQ at all, but that was not why I bought it. Primarily for protection, I want to make sure that my babies get the best. Interestingly I can now see that when it is up and running total power consumption is around 4 - 4.5 amps (at 220v).
 

CnoEvil

New member
Aug 21, 2009
556
14
0
Visit site
Neuphonix said:
Well, been home for a week now & the first thing that I will say is that my brief flirtation with the idea of buying a TT is over. The Akurate just sounds superior to my ears.

This is why I encourage people with a DS to think carefully before spending on vinyl, especially if they are starting from scratch.

Neuphonix said:
Also, how glad I am to have moved away from the Diablos. As fine as they do sound, the Refs just wipe the floor. It was worthwhile to have had a couple of weeks to remind me of the differences between the two.

Again, this would be my view. I like the Focals with the 35i, but it's always a relief to get back to the Refs.

Neuphonix said:
OK, onto the 50P. Bear in mind I did not do any side by side comparisons, the units are just too heavy to be able to easily set them up together. God the 50P is a beast, have had some difficulty in rearranging my rack to fit it in, not something I want to be moving around too often. Have ordered a nice thick granite tablet to place to amp on, it's way to heavy to go into the rack.

Got to say that there is not a massive difference, presentation is obviously very similar. I am definitely left with the impression that the Refs do appreciate the extra juice though, they just seem to be more controlled, stop & start on a dime.

This is most apparent in the lower end, before there was a slight wooliness in the low to mid bass, this is now significantly reduced. I do wonder if the room is the greater contributor in this regard than the amp?

So if I was to put a subjective % figure on the improvement to the system I would say 12.7562%. :?

If I had had the opportunity to do a home demo prior to purchase I may not have bothered. But once I move the 35P on the changeover will have been manageable, so all in all pretty happy.

These are exactly the improvements I would expect, and when you get fully used to them, will probably be a greater improvement than you realize atm. It's the kind of upgrade that is worth having if you are not spending too much to change.

Neuphonix said:
So you should probably be content with the 35i, while I don't doubt stepping up would improve things for you the difference is not night and day.

It's probably the VFM sweet spot of the range

Neuphonix said:
I'm dissapointed that the Klimax purchase didn't work out, I would have thought that the two in tandem would have added up to a pretty significant overall lift.

I have no doubt that this will happen when the opportunity arises.....and imo will lift the level of performance in your system considerably.

Neuphonix said:
BTW I have also just added one of these into the system: http://thortechnologies.com.au/products/product/ps10-smart-power-station

Can't say that I noticed any difference to SQ at all, but that was not why I bought it. Primarily for protection, I want to make sure that my babies get the best. Interestingly I can now see that when it is up and running total power consumption is around 4 - 4.5 amps (at 220v).

The main thing is that it isn't making things worse. After you've lived with it for a while, plug the power amp into the wall to make sure that it isn't squashing dynamics.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts