manicm said:And many older movies on Blu-ray are a complete waste of cash.
Diamond Joe said:I'm sure Blu-ray is a growing success, but my experience has so far been anything but. I've got a Sony BDP-S363 which is within a whisker of getting thrown out of the window, from its lethargic operation to not actually knowing if it will play a film all the way through without stopping, or even play it at all, has made it a very frustrating experience.
professorhat said:... due to scratches being removed by Lovefilm by removing a layer of the Blu-ray which eventually results in the disc being unplayable. In each circumstance though, I've just reported this to Lovefilm and got another rental free.
Every single Blu-ray I've purchased (have well over 200 films now) has played just fine on my PS3 and Marantz player though.
theo12 said:The Cloud is coming and by means of overcoming bandwidth issues, instead of receiving discs through the post, you order a copy of a film from the cloud, which will deliver Full HD picture and sound and within a reasonable time frame. Large storage space at a cheap price, coupled with the fact that most of the population spend the most money on a television than any other piece of AV equipment (barring the computer) means the end of the disc is in sight albeit quite a way off yet.
Jase Brown said:Andy Clough said:I think the bigger question here is whether Blu-ray will be the last disc-based format for films. In future will we all be streaming them from a virtual cloud, or do people still want to own something tangible?
I think it'll be the last, but it'll probably be replaced by a solid state device. I thing a lot of people are getting miss lead by HD streaming. The general public think this is the same quality as Blu-Ray. It isn't and it frustates me that the mass media give this impression that it is, when talking about it.
strapped for cash said:Having read this month's WHF I picked up a rival publication, which featured an interview with Oliver Stone. Stone was an advocate of Blu-ray, but suggested we've reached a tipping point in terms of quality, with many consumers prefering the convenience of film streaming over the higher quality Blu-ray offers.
You understand correctly if my work colleagues are anything to go byThe_Lhc said:I understood that the US was if anything worse off than us for broadband.
professorhat said:strapped for cash said:Having read this month's WHF I picked up a rival publication, which featured an interview with Oliver Stone. Stone was an advocate of Blu-ray, but suggested we've reached a tipping point in terms of quality, with many consumers prefering the convenience of film streaming over the higher quality Blu-ray offers.
I don't really understand this though - at the moment, film streaming isn't really that convenient unless you have a huge download capacity on your broadband (at least 50 Mbps). And very few people have this in the UK. Without this, you end up with either a long wait before you can start to watch a film to allow enough of a buffer to download or stuttrering of the video / audio as the download struggles to keep up with the real-time demand. It's still far more convenient to either own a collection of films or subscribe to a postal rental service and play them at your leisure. Clearly Oliver Stone will be talking about the US and perhaps they do have that level of broadband for the mainstream now, but I'd be surprised.
This will change in the future, but as others have said, the UK especially is still a long way off from this facility being mainstream.
Clearwater said:I refuse to call it BLU ray. The marketing people who came up with that aught to be shot.
Clearwater said:Streaming is the future, DVDs are the past. Blue Ray is caught in the middle which is unlucky for those heavily investing in this technology.