- Aug 10, 2019
- 2,556
- 4
- 0
I recently watched 'The Abyss' on dvd and I was surprised at how small the picture was i.e. how much of the screen was taken up by black bars.
I know that films are shot in different aspect ratios, so my surprise wasn't at the presence of black bars, which I don't really have an issue with. What did puzzle me is that the claimed aspect ratio on the disc is 2.35:1, and I have many films with this aspect ratio, none of which reduce the size of the picture to such an extent.
Is there any reason why 2 films with the same aspect ratio would differ in the thickness of the black bars, or is this likely to be a miss-statement on the back of 'The Abyss' dvd box?
Just to reiterate, I'm not complaining at the presence of the bars. I know '2001' and 'How the West was won' are wider and the picture therefore smaller, but their aspect ratios reflect this.
Any ideas?
I know that films are shot in different aspect ratios, so my surprise wasn't at the presence of black bars, which I don't really have an issue with. What did puzzle me is that the claimed aspect ratio on the disc is 2.35:1, and I have many films with this aspect ratio, none of which reduce the size of the picture to such an extent.
Is there any reason why 2 films with the same aspect ratio would differ in the thickness of the black bars, or is this likely to be a miss-statement on the back of 'The Abyss' dvd box?
Just to reiterate, I'm not complaining at the presence of the bars. I know '2001' and 'How the West was won' are wider and the picture therefore smaller, but their aspect ratios reflect this.
Any ideas?