paulkebab
New member
that's up to the designer. Then there's tube rolling to consider.. hmm not for me to be honest but it's an option.
newlash09 said:Infiniteloop said:newlash09 said:Infiniteloop said:I'll make a prediction:
The OP will hook up the new Electrocompaniet Amp and be rightfully pleased with it. It will sound different to what he has now.
However, it is another SS Amp and the whole point of this thread is that the OP has an itch to scratch.
That itch will still be there.
The only way to satisfy that itch is with a full Valve Amp. - No compromises.
Scenario 2 is, if I go for a tube amp, like that mcinstosh option that I have. Then I will probably retain the Parasound for the bass in a bi amped setup. So the tube amp will actually entail expenditure, and the electrocompaniet probably not much
This makes no sense. Do you think Valve Amps don’t do bass, or something?
But from reading alone, what I gather is that Valve amps have rounded bass, just like their mid range. But I like taught bass. Hence the thought of a SS amp for bass. If iam wrong, I would be delighted.
But with the McIntosh's 100 watts. Iam sure adding the parasound for bass would give me more dynamic headroom
Generalisations can be misleading:
https://www.whathifi.com/ear-yoshino/v12/review