General Hi-Fi post - social media

[Revolutions]

I really wanted to hear a difference when I had the chance of buying some Townshend speaker cables at a really good price. I'd have probably just jumped on them at the price, but had the chance to try them out. To me, they gave me nothing over what I was already using. So, I didn't buy them. Where does that fit in with the whole non-blind test, will hear differences based on price etc?

When it comes to psychoacoustics, you will ultimately hear what you believe to be true.

Our working memory for sound is so short, it’s rarely the case that anyone could remember how the previous clip sounded once you’ve listened to option b,

I’m sure you well know that you’ll sell far more units by giving people their favourite drink whilst listening, or that even a 2db volume increase will make a speaker shine, or tracks with acoustic instruments make everyone smile…

 

[Dave_]

Nobody posting on this forum, gets paid for doing so or, gets paid when a thread is viewed.

Doesn't change the fact that your description of social media/YT applies here equally though...

 

[GSV Ethics Gradient]

I think that the point being made is that being paid gives an incentive to do what it takes to get views. It's entirely possible that this makes content more shouty, extreme, controversial. And quite possibly less true to what the person actually believes.

 

[Revolutions]

I think that the point being made is that being paid gives an incentive to do what it takes to get views. It's entirely possible that this makes content more shouty, extreme, controversial. And quite possibly less true to what the person actually believes.

“You wouldn’t believe what he did next…. Scandalous! Share with 10 friends to find out…”

 

[Angle Poise-Lamp]

“You wouldn’t believe what he did next…. Scandalous! Share with 10 friends to find out…”

Share with 10?

That's me scuppered then...

 

[davidf]

Probably wise - a bit overpriced I always thought

Was a bit of a different story back in 1983, even into the 90s.

 

[davidf]

When it comes to psychoacoustics, you will ultimately hear what you believe to be true.

Well in this case, that wasn't true.

 

[Revolutions]

Well in this case, that wasn't true.

How so?

 

[davidf]

How so?

I wanted the Townshend to be superior. It wasn't. So I didn't buy it, despite the good price.

 

[Revolutions]

I wanted the Townshend to be superior. It wasn't. So I didn't buy it, despite the good price.

Do you believe that cables in general have an audible & impactful affect on how a hifi sounds?

were you surprised that it sounded the same as the other cable?

 

[davidf]

Do you believe that cables in general have an audible & impactful affect on how a hifi sounds?

were you surprised that it sounded the same as the other cable?

In general yes.

 

[Revolutions]

In general yes.

Interesting.. Did that result lead to you challenging or changing your belief about whether cables create audible impact?

Did you explore or arrive at any logical reason why cables you expected to sound better just didn't?

Apologies, I shall stop detailing the thread with an endless stream of questions. It'd be fascinating to setup some simple listening tests & then host small focus group conversations to discuss expectations vs experience etc. (in case anyone wonders why I'm single, please refer them to this thread 🤓 )