I might be getting confused as you've had a lot of kit over the years but didn't you once own a PM8005 or 6?New amp (pm6007)
Before you say anything, im having some problems with my current amp
Sub out don't work as expected,bluetooth keeps disconnecting, volume problems (very subtle volume problems), although i like the very non fatiguing sound i sometimes wish for a little more clarity in the highs (perseption of space and deatils) which don't do it for me using qed anniversary xt silver speaker cable
I also did experince the bass from my turntable as if the amp,phonostage are challenged when playing bass,looks like i would have an advantage if it had a subsonic filter
For a new amp (not b stock at hyperfi) in uk i found it for £429, in Denmark where i live i can have one for just under £336
The repair shop related to where i bought the amp wanted me based on what i told them to send the unit to them (before they asked me questions to verify if it had problems or it's just a design choice,flaw(s) by mission)
Don't you like the amp ?
Yes i do, the sound is not bright at all combined with my triangle speakers, i like the huge amount of in and outputs (+ usb), that you just give it all it's got captain and it never sound restrained harsh,compact size,mabye lowest price in europe
Have spare amps but 1-2 week without anything then a spare amp, i think is to long time to wait (repair shop)
Could have bough a PM6006 but i hear so many having problems with the model i didn't wanna take the chance
yes i did, now i own completely different speakers then i ever did, i use to have the usually bright speakers, not any moreI might be getting confused as you've had a lot of kit over the years but didn't you once own a PM8005 or 6?
A classic. It's everything I like about the NAD brand.Last week I got a NAD 3240PE amplifier from 1987-89 fully serviced and recapped and in mint condition too.
Very pleased with the sound, superior to the 3020's that I have and gives my more modern Cambridge Audio amp a run for its money.
Pod, if you were to upgrade now would you consider the all in one Yamaha rn2000?I think I'll keep my system until it dies, or I do. I'm not itching to upgrade at all, but you never know what's round the Class D streaming amp corner and prices will fall as they become more popular and mainstream. I would love a HIFI Rose RS520 but it's too much at £3399 so I'm going to wait until something nearly as good appears, at a lower price, or see if these RS520 units ever fall in price. It's still state of the art in HIFI terms, so these things still fetch a premium. There are several brands still up there, such as Cambridge Audio, NAD, Marantz and Denon and the middle ground is very busy. Most companies are making streamers now and I do like the Eversolo stuff. I'm wondering if Audiolab would ever release a Class D streamer, without a phono stage or CD player etc. Not used my Omnia's CD player for 2 years and I'm never going to buy a TT. I do like useful displays however, but the Marantz M1 and Denon Home Amp don't have one. I'm always going to be a 'one box solution' customer and I do like the fact most streamers and streaming amps are not the 'standard' 43cm HIFI width. The smaller the better really. The latest Arcam amps and streamer look OK, but it's all fresh air inside. They could have put the streamer in all of the amps as an extra feature, just in case you changed your mind and needed one, or they could have at least released the ST5 and CD5 as one box. There's more than enough room for streaming and CD player chips etc. This thing is 800 quid and probably cost 80 quid to make. No thanks. Just another company with no vision and not brave enough to step outside of their comfort zone. It MUST be 43cm!
https://www.stereonet.com/uk/images/uploads/5924/arcam_st5_interior__large_full.jpg
It's a fair point Pod 🙂Hi Jason. Not my thing at all these days, although I've had and enjoyed various Yamaha kit several years ago. This thing is a bit big and bulky and has a phono stage etc. I'm not buying anything with features I won't be using and the VU meters are one of the things I hate about HIFI. They are completely useless and belong in recording studios, where levels need to be monitored and adjusted at the mixing desk etc. I have virtual ones on my Audiolab Omnia and they never get used. A cheaper HIFI Rose RS520 is what I'm waiting for. I bet this Yamaha sounds fantastic though and it will sit nicely in many living rooms I'm certain. Sadly, Yamaha has fallen into the overengineering trap and they have things like this on the product website: 'Completing the solid rigidity of the amplifier are its heavy-duty silver-plated brass feet firmly reinforcing the rich, foundational low-frequency response and filling it with musicality.' Utter nonsense. It's all a bit blingy and deceptive. I can guarantee silver plated brass feet won't be able to affect the sound. There's lots of this stuff, from many companies and I don't fall for the marketing snake oil these days. I can't see many people needing an FM coaxial socket for radio, when they can stream many stations at much better quality, This guy has the Yamaha sat next to a HIFI Rose and they are like chalk and cheese, with the huge, guaranteed to break, knobs and switches on the Yamaha and the HIFI Rose allowing you to choose several controls via the lovely display. As I mentioned, the Yamaha has silly VU meters, where the HIFI Rose doesn't, but allows you to choose several, if that's your thing. The HIFI Rose is a look to the future, but as you suggested, this Yamaha has a retro feel to it and very much feels something from the past.
Actually, besides coming out with my modern Yamaha Zuma 125 in 2022 😉, I've seen Yamaha jump on the same Streaming wagon that many or most others have, with musicast, its special app for phones, of course, and much of the same modern crap that all modern types are buying. There's nothing 80s about their WXA and WXC pieces, for instance, sans meters, phono sections, A&B speakers, etc., etc.:Yamaha make some great kit, but I think their design philosophy and target audience are still stuck in the 80s. They don't seem to be able to redefine their brand, to allow them to include all the things people are really after these days. Phono stage, FM aerial socket, VU meters, 2 pairs of speaker outputs, tone contols, loudness button. All very 1980s and old school and none of this is on my wish list next time. It's a similar outlook to that I mentioned earlier by Arcam and other brands, where all their kit has to be the 'standard' 43cm wide. An exception to this idea is Cyrus, but they have the same case they've had for decades, which is now showing its limitations with many people wanting larger and clearer and often touch displays, to access comprehensive menus and features. Many companies are still tied to the ideas about HIFI they had decades ago and seem to be stuck in a rut. The HIFI Rose RS520 amongst several of their devices, was designed from the ground up, without the baggage or restrictions of previous designs. The bloke who released the HIFI Rose brand had a clean sheet of paper and has made some incredible products. If they could grab a bigger slice of the HIFI pie, perhaps they could produce their kit at lower prices and become a more mainstream brand, rather than the esoteric and exotic company they are still considered to be. It's a fairly new brand, compared to established brands such as Yamaha, but I think we do need fresh ideas about HIFI and technology in general.
I don't think they are expensive. It's more a question of value for money and to put all the components in a system individually would cost a lot more.The HIFI Rose RS520 is special and does everything really well, although it is very expensive. I'm done with 'also ran' devices, offering average sound and features.
It's good value for money, if you can afford one. If you can't then it's expensive.I don't think they are expensive. It's more a question of value for money and to put all the components in a system individually would cost a lot more.
With 'also ran' devices, the old saying 'buy cheap, buy twice' springs to mind.
But surely it could be perceived as bad value for money even if its not expensive.It's good value for money, if you can afford one. If you can't then it's expensive.
Precisely, and while as always some things are better, there is so much, increasingly, where the prices far exceed the marginal gains. Streaming is hot, involving many players, ever-new features on unending models, and may be especially value-suspect.But surely it could be perceived as bad value for money even if its not expensive.
Perhaps all competitive monopolies exist within a capitalist market which includes high-fidelity audio.Precisely, and while as always some things are better, there is so much, increasingly, where the prices far exceed the marginal gains. Streaming is hot, involving many players, ever-new features on unending models, and may be especially value-suspect.
I see aptx does it do Ldac ?
I see aptx does it do Ldac ?
It's the best experience I've had with Bluetooth