BigH
Well-known member
Green Bow said:CnoEvil said:Green Bow said:I'd really love more than just one review of this amplifier too.
Here you go: http://www.hifiplus.com/articles/lavardin-model-isx-integrated-amplifier/
Lavardin and Harbeth are all about putting musical enjoyment first, rather than chasing specs, or going for an initial 'showboat" impression.
Only a listen will convince you one way, or another.
Thank you, but that's the Lavardin ISx integrated amplifier. The one I was looking at was the Lavardin ISx Reference integrated. .. No worries though.
I was keen to press on yesterday, and almost got on the phonoe to buy the Moon 240i. .. Today I feel deflated, and less decided. I wasn't actually sure if I was decided on the Moon 240i. However it always seems be the amplifier I think I will have to buy.
I think I can mamage with its meagre two RCA inputs, as that's what I use now. Though another RCA input would be for safety margin. .. OK then I think. I can use its digital inputs.
My stumbling blocks are few:
The descriptions of it that pro-reviewers make. Nothing bad. They all say it's a bargain. However none of them seem to mention massive detail levels. It makes me think that it's a very tonally beautiful amp, and smooth and refined. However just maybe not a detail monkey. I know What HiFi say, "It doesn't sacrifice an ounce of detial, in being so smooth". Yet they don't bullet point its detail level. I may have just interpreted this wrong, becauase they descibe subleties not normally heard at this level. Maybe that's there way of describing its detail level.
It would have ben nice if its 50W/ch at 8 ohms, correlated to 100W/ch at 4ohm. Instead it's only 75W/ch at 4ohms.
If I then go up the chain, to a Moon that doubles wattage when speaker impedance is halved, there is the Moon 340i. A basic analogue or choice of DAC incorporated. However reviews on that are rare again.
Since it's such a minfield of pitfalls and lack of pro reviews, on many models. You feel like you are compromising on the best you find of what's left. Hence you think you are compromising. Not deciding so much, based of loads of inofrmation.
How can you be decided if you have not heard it? You should take your time and hear many different options. I would not go by reviews for various reasons, the other equipement will no doubt be different, the room will be different, the reviewers hearing, taste etc. will be different, the music will probably be different. WHF never review Harbeth, because won't send them any speakers to review. WHF have a specially treated room, cost a lot of money, do you have anything similar? Looking at the WHF music choice, I think most of it's awful. Many reviews don't have the gear for a long time, it may only be a few hours. You have been given some good options I would explore those. The only way to decide is by using your own ears, with your music, best to try at home before buying if you can.