its been said by some on here J Play makes no difference - I have thought of a honest scenario last year during the beta testing for the latest JPLay as I remember it I thought I would share
People from different parts of the world who dont know each other, dont speak to each other directly all have different systems, different rooms, different music tastes etc are participating and feeding back - standard stuff
I participated and was testing the releases as they was coming out. As I recall there was no consensus at all - some preferred this beta some preferred that - I preferred the last official released jplay rather than any of the betas
I remember testing beta 14 and it was straight away one of those moments - if you change and tinker with kit and bits you get moments when things click and the audio sounds the best its ever done to you, I am sure everyone has exprienced that probably more than once. I assume this is what hifi buff call system synergy, that was me for beta 14.
Audio nirvana, I cant stop listening good sounding, wow moment
Then looking at the consensus from the posted feedback it was pretty much the same for everyone - there are always 2 releases official and alternative as some prefer one to the other and therefore there is both options. Some preferred as always one or the other but still beta 14.
I remember beta 14 expiring and it was like audio heartbreak for me having to go back to the old official jplay sound. Most participators were asking for beta 14 to become the new official jplay when they released it they loved it that much, as much as me. I distinctly remember one person commenting on their distress that they had setup a demo for multiple people by the sounds of it and then coudlnt get jplay to work (because the beta had expired) - I assume they were some sort of dealer doing a demo - but again they chose beta 14 over the official jplay release which has no expiry - thats no coincidence I dont feel in that situation - they wuld be demoing what they felt was their best sound
JPlay actually released beta 15 after and all the same participants posted that it was far worse than beta 14 and they wanted beta 14 back / to be used for the official release.
Basically all jplay had done as they was open about it was change some code to try and fix a bug - that was it everything else was exactly same.
But all different people, all over the world, in different rooms, with different systems, with different computers setup differently - all manner of combinations probably none of them the same that dont know each other shared the same feedback and experience about beta 15 being worse than 14.
Now while changing only one line of code is an extreme example of what can cause an audible difference from a programme like jplay and I appreciate difficult to possibly believe - However looking at the scenario of multiple beta platforms with no consensus as best sound to one beta platform with majority general consensus for best sounding beta for all those different people, scenarios, systems etc may help show there is something in the software and the accusation its does nothing might not actuallty be factually accurate as some have posted they believe.
I dont expect this to change their opinion - nothing will and I expect a manner of remarks based on expectation bias etc, which is fair enough. However the chances of this diversity of people sharing one common opinion on something like is extemely rare and worth pointing out