S
I got to say that Vladimir has help me on here and I thank him for that but we all need to get on as life is to short to full out with one another there is to much personal comments thrown at each other I have had it done to me and it's not good but all this will do is put off new members why wast your time on a topic that no ones going to agree on its only Hifi not the end of the world do not act like kids in a play ground be kind to each other and let's get on with each otherVladimir said:SemiChronic said:What Trolls? also springs to mind.
First on the list of suspects would be new members with big questions and small temper.
SemiChronic said:Fubar, like you i also say things as i see them, and if that doesnt compliment the 'professors' then so be it.
MajorFubar said:Thompsonuxb said:Ok look at it logicaly let's say I have a 250quid HTC 1 mobile phone connected via 3mm Jack to my amp as my source.
The sound quality to my speakers is not great - so I upgrade my speakers.....What sort of improvement will I get? Say I upgrade my amp, any better?But say I upgrade my source to a 500quid used audiolab cd8200 off eBay......... And play CD's?Curious to see if the penny drops.
You've perhaps quite rightly opened a loophole, because in my scenario I didn't explicitly quote the assumption that my hypothetical £250 CDP/amp/speakers are at the top of their game for their price. Having added that clarity, feel free to have a think if that changes your answer.
Infiniteloop said:TrevC said:Infiniteloop said:TrevC said:Infiniteloop said:TrevC said:[url="http://matrixhifi.com/ENG_contenedor_ppec.htm" said:http://matrixhifi.com/ENG_contenedor_ppec.htm[/url]
Er, No thanks.
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/proaudio/behringer-a500.html
What do you expect? It's better, more powerful, less distorted etc than that valve thing you own. In any case it sounded just as good as the expensive amp in the test.
I dont use reviews or marketing to fuel my views - they are arrived at by using my ears. Just because they don't tally with your own, it doesn't mean I'm going to eventually come round to your way of thinking. Changing my way of thinking will take real world listening sessions and experience.Vladimir said:I love LOVE his thread. It's been years since I read it and I'm sucked in reading it again. David and Gazzip you should read it. Out of the bunch I think you will eventually enlighten yourself and join the rational and pro science side. There is a term for when someone needs to shake off injected fake belief sistems through religion, marketing, ideology or any other indictrination. Deprogramming.
David@FrankHarvey said:I dont use reviews or marketing to fuel my views - they are arrived at by using my ears. Just because they don't tally with your own, it doesn't mean I'm going to eventually come round to your way of thinking. Changing my way of thinking will take real world listening sessions and experience.Vladimir said:I love LOVE his thread. It's been years since I read it and I'm sucked in reading it again. David and Gazzip you should read it. Out of the bunch I think you will eventually enlighten yourself and join the rational and pro science side. There is a term for when someone needs to shake off injected fake belief sistems through religion, marketing, ideology or any other indictrination. Deprogramming.
I did consider using that system as a base to work from, but the CD and amp are officially around the £400 mark, although the going rate is around £300. I was sticking to new equipment at rrp.Thompsonuxb said:It makes no difference that still stands......
Eg Marantz cd6005+pm6005+maBronze.
Audiolab cd8200 will still bring the 'best' improvement
Sorry, no one has programmed me.Vladimir said:
David@FrankHarvey said:I did consider using that system as a base to work from, but the CD and amp are officially around the £400 mark, although the going rate is around £300. I was sticking to new equipment at rrp.?Thompsonuxb said:It makes no difference that still stands......
Eg Marantz cd6005+pm6005+maBronze.
Audiolab cd8200 will still bring the 'best' improvement
The reason I chose the amplifier in this case is that any CD player that will make a worthwhile improvement over the 6005 would be over the £500 limit (£550-600) in my opinion, so I decided to go with the amplifier instead (maybe something like a Rotel RA11), which would would drive the (presumably) Bronze 2 speakers much better, giving a tighter performance and a worthwhile difference.
If instead we changed the Bronze 2 for Bronze 5, I don't feel there would be a worthwhile change, as the quality of the electronics hasn't changed in any way. If you change for another manufacturer's speakers, you're just putting a different spin on the end result, but again, there has been no increase in quality of the signal entering the speaker.
I've heard £200 speakers in the past (equivalents to the Bronze 2) sound pretty amazing on an amplifier that was around the £2000 mark, and sounding way better than they really ought to for their price. Quality in.
David@FrankHarvey said:Sorry, no one has programmed me.Vladimir said:
I find the scenario presented in that link pretty hard to believe.
Vladimir said:Sorry, no one has programmed me.[url="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/12752-blind-listening-tests-amplifiers.html" said:Deprogram now![/url]
I find the scenario presented in that link pretty hard to believe.
im with you..cables make big difference..ssshhh you didnt hear me say that.im whispering! In case those boffins start getting unctious...SemiChronic said:If amp and speakers was out of the question, id rather throw the money at cables(had good improvements from cable swaps)
Vladimir said:Sorry, no one has programmed me.?[url="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/12752-blind-listening-tests-amplifiers.html" said:Deprogram now![/url]
I find the scenario presented in that link pretty hard to believe.
I don't think I really need to go any further than the initial post.David@FrankHarvey said:Vladimir said:Sorry, no one has programmed me.[url="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/12752-blind-listening-tests-amplifiers.html" said:Deprogram now![/url]
I find the scenario presented in that link pretty hard to believe.
It's a wonderful read nevertheless. Give it a try.
Vladimir said:[url="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/12752-blind-listening-tests-amplifiers.html" said:Deprogram now![/url]
Sorry Steve. You were saying?
i read the first page and it didn't say anything about the digital source not being the heart of th whole system and that we shouldn't spend the most on the CD player and interconnects. It's over 100 pages. I'm not reading the whole thing, so I'm forced to believe that Thompson is right again thanks to Vlad's evidence.
ID. said:Vladimir said:[url="http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/12752-blind-listening-tests-amplifiers.html" said:Deprogram now![/url]
Sorry Steve. You were saying?
i read the first page and it didn't say anything about the digital source not being the heart of th whole system and that we shouldn't spend the most on the CD player and interconnects. It's over 100 pages. I'm not reading the whole thing, so I'm forced to believe that Thompson is right again thanks to Vlad's evidence.
Nevermind that. Thompson is always right.
It's interesting to read NwAvGuy's early internet posts. He disappeared from DIYaudio after that thread.