aliEnRIK:
Yes im being subjective. But in doing so im also saying this is the most 'detailed' cable ive ever heard . No frequencies seem over extended at all, it just seems to let more information through (Or technically I should say it doesnt lose detail like other cables do)
I know exactly where your coming from. I completely agree that you dont need to spend loads to get decent quality. (In a way your saying that your VERY cheap cable is as good as known brand cable which would cost 50 quid or whatever. Whilst the more expensive van damme im saying is comparable to FAR more expensive cable)
Er, no, I'm not. It stands on its own two feet for what it is. No comparison with anything, unless you consider the cable construction POV. Cost is irrelevant in the context of the discussion as we've already established that it's not a factor in the end result, or needn't be if you don't accept the "branded cable being better" line.
aliEnRIK:
But I can say without a shadow of a doubt that the LC OHC van damme is head and shoulders above any other cable ive tried. Sounds entirely neutral, music 'flows', instruments can easily be picked out from one another, treble is 'sweet' without being harsh and bass is hard hitting and detailed.
If a cable is doing all of
that, then your core components have issues, or you were using string. And the old "head and shoulders" again...straight out of the same filing cabinet where you find the folder marked "night and day".
I have that already however: the "sweet", "flowing", "detailed" and all the bass elements too, so what's delivering it? My cheap wiring or the equipment that does the real work?
aliEnRIK:
Im not going to buy those cables you speak of just to prove it to myself, im sticking with what I have now as I feel ill never need a change in speaker cales again
Hey, no worries to me, it's a hobby I can take or leave at will. I'd rather invest more time in getting the right recordings which is ahead of the wiring for me.