davidf said:I honestly thought it would start slowing over the last 6 months or so, and particularly this year. It'll be interesting to see how it goes over the course of 2017.
jjbomber said:davidf said:I honestly thought it would start slowing over the last 6 months or so, and particularly this year. It'll be interesting to see how it goes over the course of 2017.
It will build up to Record Store Day. The other factor, unfortunately, was a lot of deaths in 2016. The biggest seller was Bowie. It seems a bit strange to me, but people feel compelled to buy records just because someone has died. It is almost part of the grieving process.
Waxy said:This item featured on the radio as we were eating dinner this evening. My better half looked up from the bangers and mash I had just cooked and said "It's down to you, isn't it?"
I think she is trying to make a point about the amount of vinyl getting delivered...
There'll be a lot of collectors out there, but that won't be any different to the 90s, 80s, 70s....Diamond Joe said:I saw this at lunchtime, according to the report 48% of records are never played. Quite how accurate that is I don't know, sounds like BS to me.
I reckon that might be partly because there are a number of albums that were licensed to Music On Vinyl that are now being released by other companies due to those licenses running out. MOV were never the cheapest around, but the quality was generally good.thescarletpronster said:The increasing volume does seem to be bringing prices of LPs down a bit. Not for everything, but more LPs seem to be under £20 now than a year ago, according to my very selective and completely unscientific sampling method.
davidf said:I reckon that might be partly because there are a number of albums that were licensed to Music On Vinyl that are now being released by other companies due to those licenses running out. MOV were never the cheapest around, but the quality was generally good.thescarletpronster said:The increasing volume does seem to be bringing prices of LPs down a bit. Not for everything, but more LPs seem to be under £20 now than a year ago, according to my very selective and completely unscientific sampling method.
davidf said:I reckon that might be partly because there are a number of albums that were licensed to Music On Vinyl that are now being released by other companies due to those licenses running out. MOV were never the cheapest around, but the quality was generally good.
Al ears said:I am getting increasingly frustrated in reading extremely good reviews of LPs in other publications on to find said LP is almost impossible to get hold of due to stock numbers issued initially and the failure of the producing company to keep in line with demand.
Don't worry, I was too. There's a lot of what MOV had that are now being released by Sony and its associated smaller labels at the moment, at relatively cheap prices in comparison to MOV.thescarletpronster said:davidf said:I reckon that might be partly because there are a number of albums that were licensed to Music On Vinyl that are now being released by other companies due to those licenses running out. MOV were never the cheapest around, but the quality was generally good.
I was talking about standard new releases from major and indie labels, not reissues or 'audiophile' editions.
stevebrock said:I get tired of people ( FB friends etc ) asking me about turntables and what system I recommend for their budget of £300 - when I try an explain more funds are needed to make it worthwhile I then get asked if an ION turntable is better than a USB one being sold in Richer Sounds.
im not being snobby - just hope the fad passes soon
Vinyl done properly cannot be done on a shoestring budget - especially if the user has no knowledge of what a phono stage is - I just direct them to forums - plenty of info online