Good evening!
I am thinking of replacing my B&W 685's. I am currently running them with a Cyrus 8 XPD (with PSX - R) and a Squeezebox touch as the source. I am from Germany wich makes finding the right british speaker a bit difficult. ATC, Spendor and ProAc are not very easy to get and even if I found a dealer (witch of course I would eventually - my wife hates the looks of these )
So I called my local hifi guy who does not stock Cyrus and asked him for a few recomendations. We decided I'd pack up my amp and source and bring them with me. The speakers we decided on listening to where B&W cm 9 (since he just sold his last pair of cm8), Neat Motive 1 and the Naim Ovator S-400 (more of an experiment than a real possibility)
So when I arrived he had the Ovator running in on a Supernait and I built up my Cyrus and we connected the speakers. To the defense of the Cyrus it was cold. I know from home that it needs to run a couple of hours before it really starts sounding good. But I think it just did not controll the Ovators very well. Female voices where very sharp and everything was very laid back. We then switched to the Supernait to compare. This sounded better but it was not the sound I was after. So on to the next speaker.
We connected the Motive 1 and after 5 seconds we both noticed that this was a better match. Mutch more controll over all ranges. A more forward presentation with a lot of drive witch suits the Cyrus very well. AMAZING bass for such a diminutive speaker and very detailad treble. The soundstage was very nice and the stereo imaging (at the beginning of Pink Floyds "Welcome to the machine) made us both grin and turn up the volume. It was just fun to listen to music with this combination with may let me overlook the mid range with is not the most detailed.
We then connected the B&W CM9. This sounden good. But somehow a little boring. Mids were very good. Listened to a few Dave Matthews tracks and the voices are very realistic and detailed but the presentation somehow did not really excite me.
So the winner in this short group test was the Motive 1 wich brings me to the questions I have for you all, dear forum members.
Is the lack of excitement with the CM9 due to not enough amplifier power (the 8xpd has 70 WPC)? Would the CM 8 sound better with the Cyrus 8 XPD?
I noticed with the Motive 1 that my volume controll had to be turned up very high (the Motive's have a sensibility of 86 db...). Is the Motive 1 a good choice for the 8 XPD? Should I rather bi-amp with another 8 or X power?
My dealer did not have the Motive 2 SE or Motive 2 there, unfortunately. I read in a lot of reviews that the Motive 2 sounds better than the 1. Is the EMIT tweeter on the Motive 2 SE better?
My room is approximately 25 sqm.
And one last question. Has anyone heard the AUDIUM Comp 5? It is built in Berlin and looks like a very interesting speaker.
Are there any other Speakers I should try? Music is mixed from Classical over Jazz to Rock.
Sorry for any mistakes (I am german..) and for the rather long text.
Any suggestions are welcome!
I am thinking of replacing my B&W 685's. I am currently running them with a Cyrus 8 XPD (with PSX - R) and a Squeezebox touch as the source. I am from Germany wich makes finding the right british speaker a bit difficult. ATC, Spendor and ProAc are not very easy to get and even if I found a dealer (witch of course I would eventually - my wife hates the looks of these )
So I called my local hifi guy who does not stock Cyrus and asked him for a few recomendations. We decided I'd pack up my amp and source and bring them with me. The speakers we decided on listening to where B&W cm 9 (since he just sold his last pair of cm8), Neat Motive 1 and the Naim Ovator S-400 (more of an experiment than a real possibility)
So when I arrived he had the Ovator running in on a Supernait and I built up my Cyrus and we connected the speakers. To the defense of the Cyrus it was cold. I know from home that it needs to run a couple of hours before it really starts sounding good. But I think it just did not controll the Ovators very well. Female voices where very sharp and everything was very laid back. We then switched to the Supernait to compare. This sounded better but it was not the sound I was after. So on to the next speaker.
We connected the Motive 1 and after 5 seconds we both noticed that this was a better match. Mutch more controll over all ranges. A more forward presentation with a lot of drive witch suits the Cyrus very well. AMAZING bass for such a diminutive speaker and very detailad treble. The soundstage was very nice and the stereo imaging (at the beginning of Pink Floyds "Welcome to the machine) made us both grin and turn up the volume. It was just fun to listen to music with this combination with may let me overlook the mid range with is not the most detailed.
We then connected the B&W CM9. This sounden good. But somehow a little boring. Mids were very good. Listened to a few Dave Matthews tracks and the voices are very realistic and detailed but the presentation somehow did not really excite me.
So the winner in this short group test was the Motive 1 wich brings me to the questions I have for you all, dear forum members.
Is the lack of excitement with the CM9 due to not enough amplifier power (the 8xpd has 70 WPC)? Would the CM 8 sound better with the Cyrus 8 XPD?
I noticed with the Motive 1 that my volume controll had to be turned up very high (the Motive's have a sensibility of 86 db...). Is the Motive 1 a good choice for the 8 XPD? Should I rather bi-amp with another 8 or X power?
My dealer did not have the Motive 2 SE or Motive 2 there, unfortunately. I read in a lot of reviews that the Motive 2 sounds better than the 1. Is the EMIT tweeter on the Motive 2 SE better?
My room is approximately 25 sqm.
And one last question. Has anyone heard the AUDIUM Comp 5? It is built in Berlin and looks like a very interesting speaker.
Are there any other Speakers I should try? Music is mixed from Classical over Jazz to Rock.
Sorry for any mistakes (I am german..) and for the rather long text.
Any suggestions are welcome!