Wow. So the first poster returns. I haven't replied yet because I wrote that post before bed, went to work, and here I am back to read the furore it has created. Nice.
I do think my point has been missed.
I want to know what sounds best. I do care about the science and technology involved as a lot of us do, simply because we have an interest in such things. However at the end of the day I want to know what sounds best within my budget range.
I'm also a medical doctor by trade. Within my role as a doctor I strive to find treatments for my patients which work best for them. To do this we gather evidence.
In the journey to find evidence we conduct and review . research. We all know how strong the placebo effect can be.
I think you know where this is going now...!
I do subscribe to whathifi and enjoy reading it. However as I have become older and (??) wiser I have leant to take any review of electrical equipment from any source with a large pinch of salt when that review starts talking about very subjective things.
I was stimulated to write my original post when I read whathifi reviews of mains leads. The lloytron review in particular which slated the 4 quid cable For not providing precision and depth to a bluray of clockwork orange.
Now this I'm afraid is a load of tosh! It is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a mains cable to make any difference to such equipment. Instead whf recommend cables costing £40 or more... For a kettle lead, when the lead that the manufacturer provides in the box is just fine.
Now it would be very easy for a reviewer to test a handful of leads, not knowing anything about them, then rate each one. This was we would know, in a more scientific manner, if these leads really do make a difference. That way whf would be doing a service to their loyal readership, letting UA know where not to waste our money.
If you are put in front of equipment and are told it's really expensive, and it comes from a manufacturer you are fond of, you will, because of the power of placebo, find it better than a less expensive model.