Andrew Everard said:Tonestar1 said:With Samsung's budget you would think the could have poached someone from Loewe or B&O.
Instead, they went for someone from B&Q.
:rofl:
(just woke my very angry wife up with my laughing :shhh: )
Andrew Everard said:Tonestar1 said:With Samsung's budget you would think the could have poached someone from Loewe or B&O.
Instead, they went for someone from B&Q.
Andrew Everard said:bigboss said:I know that link. They're just guesses.
And possibly rather more creative guesses than the 'knocked up in a school metalwork class' reality.
Tonestar1 said:Perhaps I got a little carried away with the multiview. I do think it could be good for kids though to prevent sibling arguements about what to watch.
bigboss said:Andrew Everard said:Tonestar1 said:With Samsung's budget you would think the could have poached someone from Loewe or B&O.
Instead, they went for someone from B&Q.
:rofl:
(just woke my very angry wife up with my laughing :shhh: )
strapped for cash said:My view is that manufacturers should spend less time developing new features and get the basics right: genuinely accurate colour reproduction, without the need for professional calibration; flawless motion; contrast levels that rival CRT televisions; and perfect screen uniformity.
bigboss said:I think this talk feature is the beginning of things to come. Maybe in 5 years' time, we'll be talking to our devices to make a cup of tea / watch a film / put the heater on etc. and remotes may become obsolete. Our future generation may laugh at us for using "those plastic things with buttons" to make devices work.
bigboss said:strapped for cash said:My view is that manufacturers should spend less time developing new features and get the basics right: genuinely accurate colour reproduction, without the need for professional calibration; flawless motion; contrast levels that rival CRT televisions; and perfect screen uniformity.
Unfortunately, improvement in picture quality doesn't encourage most people to buy new TVs (except people like us who frequent TV forums). New features grab headlines, which drive sales.
strapped for cash said:Mark my words, we're edging ever closer to a robot slave revolt.
strapped for cash said:bigboss said:strapped for cash said:My view is that manufacturers should spend less time developing new features and get the basics right: genuinely accurate colour reproduction, without the need for professional calibration; flawless motion; contrast levels that rival CRT televisions; and perfect screen uniformity.
Unfortunately, improvement in picture quality doesn't encourage most people to buy new TVs (except people like us who frequent TV forums). New features grab headlines, which drive sales.
Shame, isn't it.
strapped for cash said:Tonestar1 said:Perhaps I got a little carried away with the multiview. I do think it could be good for kids though to prevent sibling arguements about what to watch.
Sorry, I didn't mean to mock your enthusiasm. Take my comments with a pinch of salt.
I'm sure some will find that functionality exciting. And it has genuine value when it comes to multiplayer gaming.
My view is that manufacturers should spend less time developing new features and get the basics right: genuinely accurate colour reproduction, without the need for professional calibration; flawless motion; contrast levels that rival CRT televisions; and perfect screen uniformity.
Andrew Everard said:strapped for cash said:Mark my words, we're edging ever closer to a robot slave revolt.
Apparently no truth in the rumour that next year's CES-opening keynote is being given by Skynet.
Tonestar1 said:Tony is watching the news
Tony has changed the channel
Tony is watching the adult channel
"Damn it! How do I turn that poxy twittbook feed thing off?
strapped for cash said:The sad truth is that I'd be willing to pay twice the price of my GT50 for the kind of performance I described above, but I'm certainly in a small minority in this regard.
Andrew Everard said:strapped for cash said:The sad truth is that I'd be willing to pay twice the price of my GT50 for the kind of performance I described above, but I'm certainly in a small minority in this regard.
Not to mention the opportunity to put on the screen a picture of your three boys in Mexico – which you pronounce 'Meh-hico' just in case anyone thought you were a tourist – , take a lightpen, scribble a message all over the picture, then send it to all your friends.
Andrew Everard said:strapped for cash said:The sad truth is that I'd be willing to pay twice the price of my GT50 for the kind of performance I described above, but I'm certainly in a small minority in this regard.
Not to mention the opportunity to put on the screen a picture of your three boys in Mexico – which you pronounce 'Meh-hico' just in case anyone thought you were a tourist – , take a lightpen, scribble a message all over the picture, then send it to all your friends.
bigboss said:Andrew Everard said:Tonestar1 said:With Samsung's budget you would think the could have poached someone from Loewe or B&O.
Instead, they went for someone from B&Q.
:rofl:
(just woke my very angry wife up with my laughing :shhh: )
bigboss said:strapped for cash said:My view is that manufacturers should spend less time developing new features and get the basics right: genuinely accurate colour reproduction, without the need for professional calibration; flawless motion; contrast levels that rival CRT televisions; and perfect screen uniformity.
Unfortunately, improvement in picture quality doesn't encourage most people to buy new TVs (except people like us who frequent TV forums). New features grab headlines, which drive sales.
bigboss said:What they do, is latch on to another technology for picture improvements (like OLED, which is more headline grabbing) rather than perfect existing technologies.
bigboss said:Panasonic has improved its picture quality year on year while Samsung advertised its unique features that no one would use. The result? Panasonic is on the brink of exiting TV business while Samsung continues to post record sales.