Jota180 said:
shadders said:
eggontoast said:
What a strange bunch you all are.
You all moan about the cost of new Hi-Fi and how much it has gone up in recent years, but some alleged 'technical genius' puts up a webpage and charges you a couple of hundred quid to change a few caps and that's reasonable *wacko*
What about all the R&D, sourcing of components, testing and approvals verification for different parts of the world, manufacturing setup and production engineering, distribution and warranty costs that the poor manufacturer has to pay out. This is before paying any wages, business taxes, national insurances contributions etc etc and you lot want to pay a fiver for the end product, then you wonder why they’ve skimped on a display or made it in outta Mongolia.
Hi,
I am not sure of the demographics for the forum, but hifi does seem to be an older persons pursuit.
I do sometimes get the impression we are becoming a nation of brats. So many of the younger generation believe it is ok to download music illegally and defraud the artist of necessary income.
Everyone must have a smartphone that costs quite a bit of money, and then upgrade to the next one a few years later at similar cost. Yet a hifi amplifier or other, will provide years of enjoyment and yet there are complaints that the final cost is approaching the cost of two smartphones (upper end of the smartphone market).
As stated by eggontoast, the effort and "other" costs that allow a piece of equipment to reach market are significant.
Alternatively, perhaps people are too stupid to know the value of manufactured goods.
Regards,
Shadders.
It all comes down to numbers. Samsung will shift gazillions of phones while some HiFi company will shift a couple of thousand amplifiers. You get far more for your money from a phone than from an amp which really only does one thing. The younger generation has access to a music collection us old farts could only dream about, streaming through their phones.
HiFi generally is for the old farts who have settled down.
I find many old farts think it was ok to rob other nations of their wealth, defrauding the locals of necessary income all in the name of Empire. The only difference today is it's the poor robbing the rich instead of the other way around back in the days of Empire.
Hi,
younger peoples access to much more music is based on theft - illegal downloads. The change is that it is more accessible, and you can define through streamed services your genre to be listened to. "OLD" people now have the same choice, but I expect prefer to purchase the title rather than illegal download.
agreed, a smartphone can do so much more than an amplifier, but at what quality, and the battery lasts 1 day? I have seen a review where the latest Motorola smartphone positive point was that the charge lasted nearly 1 day. So I don't have a smartphone, only an old 2G where the battery charge lasts 1 week.
For music on the go, I have a portable player designed for the job.
With regards to the empire, no one old thinks of the empire as you have inferred. What does seem to be forgotten is that 99% of the UK were ruled by the ruling class and we did not personally benefit. This was the reason for the start of the Labour movement in the 20th century. Don't blame the UK for the behaviour of the few. I don't think the poor are robbing the rich.
Regards,
Shadders.