RCA cables

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the What HiFi community: the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products.
Greenwich_Man said:
So why does this magazine spend time testing cables, and advising us of the best buys?

It sells magazines?! WHIFI isn't a crusading publication acting on behalf of hifi enthusiasts. It's a commercial organisation interested in making money. There is controversy about cables so that is good press.

Chris
 
All the amps , CDPs ,DAC's act . are the same and any difference between them is a Placebo effect . All the magazines and the reviewrs

there are only commercial organisation interested in making money :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
ISAC69 said:
All the amps , CDPs ,DAC's act . are the same and any difference between them is a Placebo effect . All the magazines and the reviewrs

there are only commercial organisation interested in making money :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

:shhh:
 
ISAC69 said:
All the amps , CDPs ,DAC's act . are the same and any difference between them is a Placebo effect . All the magazines and the reviewrs

there are only commercial organisation interested in making money :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The second sentence is self-evidently true. Why else do you think they make magazines? I didn't say the things you say in the first sentence.

Chris
 
Covenanter said:
ISAC69 said:
All the amps , CDPs ,DAC's act . are the same and any difference between them is a Placebo effect . All the magazines and the reviewrs

there are only commercial organisation interested in making money :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

The second sentence is self-evidently true. Why else do you think they make magazines? I didn't say the things you say in the first sentence.

Chris

I actually rather like reading hi-fi reviews and articles about this hobby. I think it is fun.

I just remind myself that I am reading the views of a magazine jounalist who would, in all probability, rather be working on What Car magazine.
 
spiny norman said:
TrevC said:
It's a fact. A line level interconnect is a non-critical application. Any old cable will do the job as well as any other. If it works, it works.

No, that's an opinion, not a fact. Although of course in your world I can see how the two blur.

If we replaced a audiophoole IC, say Kimber cable with some wire coat hanger, what would you imagine the difference in SQ to be? If there wasn't a difference would you still disagree with Trev?
 
Um, did I imagine the better sound when I upgraded my amp recently from a Marantz PM-6002 to an Onkyo A9000R? I feel such a fool. :beer:
 
Waxy said:
Um, did I imagine the better sound when I upgraded my amp recently from a Marantz PM-6002 to an Onkyo A9000R? I feel such a fool. :beer:

I doubt anyone actually thinks that you imagined the improvements that you heard.

The really interesting questions is, What was better and why was that the case?
 
Waxy said:
Um, did I imagine the better sound when I upgraded my amp recently from a Marantz PM-6002 to an Onkyo A9000R? I feel such a fool. :beer:

Us drinkers do tend to be optimistic about beauty. :beer:
 
Waxy said:
Um, did I imagine the better sound when I upgraded my amp recently from a Marantz PM-6002 to an Onkyo A9000R? I feel such a fool. :beer:

Who's mentioned amplifiers? - it's cables under discussion.

Edit: Oh I see who; Isac69, master of logic, said "All the amps , CDPs ,DAC's act . are the same and any difference between them is a placebo effect" Just trying to muddy the waters I suppose by making such a statement. Surprising he didn't include speakers as well.
 
Anderson said:
If we replaced a audiophoole IC, say Kimber cable with some wire coat hanger, what would you imagine the difference in SQ to be? If there wasn't a difference would you still disagree with Trev?

Anderson said:
Speakers and room.

So now you're answering for TrevC?

But you're right – I can't tell the difference between two objectionablists.
 
spiny norman said:
Anderson said:
If we replaced a audiophoole IC, say Kimber cable with some wire coat hanger, what would you imagine the difference in SQ to be? If there wasn't a difference would you still disagree with Trev?

Anderson said:
Speakers and room.

So now you're answering for TrevC?

But you're right – I can't tell the difference between two objectionablists.

Prickly little devil, aren't you?
 
Waxy said:
Um, did I imagine the better sound when I upgraded my amp recently from a Marantz PM-6002 to an Onkyo A9000R? I feel such a fool. :beer:

No, it was probably half a db louder and sounded better because of it. It wouldn't have sounded any louder, just better.
 
Okay, lets sove this issue once and for all? I propose a blind listening test at my acoustically treated L.ondon studio. You bring the cables. I provide the blindfolds?

If the differences are real, fine, imagined, fine. We'll keep nice and civil and get drunk together afterwards 🙂
 
Okay, lets sove this issue once and for all? I propose a blind listening test at my acoustically treated L.ondon studio. You bring the cables. I provide the blindfolds?

If the differences are real, fine, imagined, fine. We'll keep nice and civil and get drunk together afterwards 🙂
 
spiny norman said:
TrevC said:
Prickly little devil, aren't you?

Enough of the diminutive, thank you, although I guess it helps you talk down to people.

Have some sympathy for him. Online in forums is the only place he can talk down to people, and escape away from reality by pretending that he has any significance.
 
hifikrazy said:
spiny norman said:
TrevC said:
Prickly little devil, aren't you?

Enough of the diminutive, thank you, although I guess it helps you talk down to people.

Have some sympathy for him. Online in forums is the only place he can talk down to people, and escape away from reality by pretending that he has any significance.

It isn't my fault I'm superior. 😉
 
TrevC said:
Prickly little devil, aren't you?

You've never seen Spiny obviously ...

Spiny+Norman.png
 

TRENDING THREADS