Hi,ellisdj said:Stop copy and pasting.
You can either show me good sound from cheap cabling or you cant. If you cant why not? I can show you good sound from expensive cables so it should be easy to do the same??
Hi,Vladimir said:The $1M fund is for shooting down public personalities and opinion makers in the industry like Fermer, Atkinson, PFM etc. or manufacturers, not anonimous consumers like ellisdj. Sometimes there are open group tests organized for nobodies, but rarely. The whole idea is to run an awareness campaign, not actually test things. Old foxes know they will fail them so they don't try or give up in midst organizing an event. Those that tried denied validity of DBT completely post festum as something too hard or flawed etc.
So, yeah. "Why don't you do the $1,000,000.00 James Randi challenge if you are so sure about it" is not an argument in this instance.
Hi,ellisdj said:Paste paste paste.
My complaint is when i go to listen to my hifi or demo another funnily enough I dont sit there and just look at some numbers I listen to some music on it.
Harmon Kardons extensive blind testing is all done in mono with just 1 speaker. 2 speakers allow too much variation.
Now while their testing is the most comprehensive in the industry i know if its not how I listen to music either funny enough.
So i need something simple - as simple as hearing really good sound quality relaxed and outside of the pressure of a $1million dollars being on the line. How could i possibly cope and function normally under that much duress. I couldn't the amount on offer clearly designed to have that effect for sure.
But sitting down relaxed with a cup of tea listening to really good sound. I could do that all day. So why can't you show me.
Hi,ellisdj said:If you fail you lose a million dollars and all the costs to get and stay there.
But far worse than that is how it would lool on this forum.
How can anyone honestly function normally with a million on the line. No chance in hell.
shadders said:Hi,Vladimir said:The $1M fund is for shooting down public personalities and opinion makers in the industry like Fermer, Atkinson, PFM etc. or manufacturers, not anonimous consumers like ellisdj. Sometimes there are open group tests organized for nobodies, but rarely. The whole idea is to run an awareness campaign, not actually test things. Old foxes know they will fail them so they don't try or give up in midst organizing an event. Those that tried denied validity of DBT completely post festum as something too hard or flawed etc.
So, yeah. "Why don't you do the $1,000,000.00 James Randi challenge if you are so sure about it" is not an argument in this instance.
It is a test. There is no pressure as you have nothing to lose if you fail.
We only have people stating why they cannot take the test for all manner of reasons. No one is barred from taking the test. It is open to all.
It is really simple, take the test, pass or fail. You are expected to fail, so if you do, who cares. At least you have tried to prove you can hear the difference between cables.
Regards,
Shadders.
Hi,Vladimir said:shadders said:Hi,Vladimir said:The $1M fund is for shooting down public personalities and opinion makers in the industry like Fermer, Atkinson, PFM etc. or manufacturers, not anonimous consumers like ellisdj. Sometimes there are open group tests organized for nobodies, but rarely. The whole idea is to run an awareness campaign, not actually test things. Old foxes know they will fail them so they don't try or give up in midst organizing an event. Those that tried denied validity of DBT completely post festum as something too hard or flawed etc.
So, yeah. "Why don't you do the $1,000,000.00 James Randi challenge if you are so sure about it" is not an argument in this instance.
It is a test. There is no pressure as you have nothing to lose if you fail.
We only have people stating why they cannot take the test for all manner of reasons. No one is barred from taking the test. It is open to all.
It is really simple, take the test, pass or fail. You are expected to fail, so if you do, who cares. At least you have tried to prove you can hear the difference between cables.
Regards,
Shadders.
I know my english isn't brilliant, but how are you not understanding what I wrote.
You can't take the test. Call them up and they will ask your name, then laugh, then hang up.
It's not a lab or scientific research institute. It's an awareness campaign, and to have any sort of impact they must use their limited resources effectively on public individuals. Not internet keyboard warriors and daft dentists in Surrey.
But if someone wants to test their gear, there is free ABX software. No reward except saving you thousands of pounds wasted on snake oil.
Hi,ellisdj said:I know you should be able to show me but your not willing, cant fathom that out unless you work in the industry and there happens to be some sort of conflict of interest here??
Hi,ellisdj said:Well the other side to the arguement is "we can hear it" - so I am saying if I am from the camp of person that "I need to hear it for myself", then I need to hear it for myself.
You want measurements and ABX blah blah - thats fine, I am easy I just want to hear it for myself
So I am asking you to show me because its us who always argues and sadly DaveH discounted himself as he addmitted to loathing me, so that leaves pretty much you to do it.
I am sure if I asked you to show me the measurements of different cables you would - so why when I ask you to show me really good sound from cheap cables you wont?
Because here in lies the rub - its all about sound quality, thats what were here for, not numbers, words or other BS - just sound quality.
So what needs proving is that its possible to create the very best sound quality possible from domestic sound systems with a system all wired up with the cheapest cables fit to do their jobs.
That is what we need - that is what everyone who uses and buys upmarket cables needs to hear - once they hear that they wont buy another upmarket cable in their life, because what will be the point.
However ALL the best sound I have heard from domestic systems has had upgraded cables in the systems in one fashion on another. I have heard expensive systems wired up with cheap cabling but they are not in my top ranking experiences so they dont count otherwise I already would sold mine and bought 79 strand.
So why you need what you need I simply need what I need too.
Hi,shadders said:Hi,Vladimir said:shadders said:Hi,Vladimir said:The $1M fund is for shooting down public personalities and opinion makers in the industry like Fermer, Atkinson, PFM etc. or manufacturers, not anonimous consumers like ellisdj. Sometimes there are open group tests organized for nobodies, but rarely. The whole idea is to run an awareness campaign, not actually test things. Old foxes know they will fail them so they don't try or give up in midst organizing an event. Those that tried denied validity of DBT completely post festum as something too hard or flawed etc.
So, yeah. "Why don't you do the $1,000,000.00 James Randi challenge if you are so sure about it" is not an argument in this instance.
It is a test. There is no pressure as you have nothing to lose if you fail.
We only have people stating why they cannot take the test for all manner of reasons. No one is barred from taking the test. It is open to all.
It is really simple, take the test, pass or fail. You are expected to fail, so if you do, who cares. At least you have tried to prove you can hear the difference between cables.
Regards,
Shadders.
I know my english isn't brilliant, but how are you not understanding what I wrote.
You can't take the test. Call them up and they will ask your name, then laugh, then hang up.
It's not a lab or scientific research institute. It's an awareness campaign, and to have any sort of impact they must use their limited resources effectively on public individuals. Not internet keyboard warriors and daft dentists in Surrey.
But if someone wants to test their gear, there is free ABX software. No reward except saving you thousands of pounds wasted on snake oil.
Ok, so not open to anyone. Still, people can still take a test with relevant preparation.
Regards,
Shadders.
Hi,ellisdj said:Cop Out
Hi,ellisdj said:I dont understand someone saying cheap cables are good enough doesnt to show it?
Its exacly the same - in blind testing noone gets it right - thats for all things test amps, cd players the lot, even speakers. So its obviously a difficult thing to do - its also difficult to setup and a lot of hassle to make it to a standard you would accept.
Whats easy is demoing really good sound from all cheap cables - that should be no hassle and very easy for you to show
ellisdj said:So I am asking you to show me because its us who always argues and sadly DaveH discounted himself as he addmitted to loathing me, so that leaves pretty much you to do it.
did you not just do that? LOLdaveh75 said:I think you're terminally ignorant, deluded, cocky, tiresome and ultimately a bit of knob, but nowhere did i admit to loathing you...
Hi,ellisdj said:We are here for music and to listen to music.
In ABX bind testing that Harmon do they have to train their testers to hear what they need to in order to select the right answers. They have to be trained.
So someone random going to a blind test in conditons completely unfamiliar they have no chance unless they have been trained - one tester proves nothing anyway - luck good or bad.
You might as well just save the hassle do a normal listening test. I am game when you are