Dear Editor,
I have just received my latest copy of WHF and I am surprised with the rating given to the above Lcd TV. Last month it was a 4 Star today is a 3 Star. You explain that the TV is too expensive and that other sets offer a better picture quality especially with a Blue Ray DVD and other TVs are also cheaper. The option of the new Humax Foxstar Freesat + say, a Sony 32V4000 TV still cost over £650. The Panasonic TX-32LZD81 is now for sale at £499. So my question is: with this new price from Richer Sounds doesn't the Pana deserve a 4 star or a 5 star if you just want to watch Freeview channels and the two Freesat channels available now?
Thank You,
74all
I have just received my latest copy of WHF and I am surprised with the rating given to the above Lcd TV. Last month it was a 4 Star today is a 3 Star. You explain that the TV is too expensive and that other sets offer a better picture quality especially with a Blue Ray DVD and other TVs are also cheaper. The option of the new Humax Foxstar Freesat + say, a Sony 32V4000 TV still cost over £650. The Panasonic TX-32LZD81 is now for sale at £499. So my question is: with this new price from Richer Sounds doesn't the Pana deserve a 4 star or a 5 star if you just want to watch Freeview channels and the two Freesat channels available now?
Thank You,
74all