Gerrardasnails
Well-known member
pete321:
Gerrardasnails:But you have said it yourself here, the differences, albeit minimal, were noticeable - and that was a £130 bd player going up to a £300 player (in today's money - we all know the Denon was way over priced because it was their first bd player). If that's the case, I would imagine that there is a small improvement as you go up the chain to the very top. No one is saying that the improvement has to be calculated by the cost difference - of course your brilliant Z7 is not going to sound only half as good as the £3000 Arcam. Similarly, a £4k bd player is not going to show 10 times better picture than a £400 player. However, saying that they are all look the same with a bluray spinning is hard to believe. I believe that to many the Oppo would be a better choice - a player that plays mkv?! That's great news for many but the 99% of others don't even know or care what .mkv is. My point though is the WHF review would not state that the Sony is a better bd player, if it wasn't.
Yes they're noticeable, but in terms of 1080p picture the price differences don't warrant the improvement. I've been buying hifi long enough to know that you don't get double the quality for double the price, but the Sony BDP-S350 was £200 when the 5 star DVD-2500BT was selling for £600. In my opinion no way did the Denon warrant the extra £400, especially when it spat out quite a few discs, yet it got 5 stars and I bought it (my fault I know for not testing). As for the Z7, it sounds better on my set up with movies and SACD, and as I've tweaked it's settings over the last few weeks and it's run in, it's not far off the AVR600's stereo performance. That's the Z7 is better with movies and SACD, dosen't lock-up, more features, better upscaling and not far off with stereo music. That's why I'm hesitating a bit with recent WHF reviews, £1500 extra just isn't worth it when it's worse in some areas and only slightly better in others.
I agree with you that minor improvements wouldn't make a hike in price seem worthwhile to me. However, there are plenty of others who just want the best picture they can afford. As for your receiver, that is a huge sum not to demo with your own speakers. It could well be that your speakers match the Yam more than the Arcam or that the Arcam is over priced.
Gerrardasnails:But you have said it yourself here, the differences, albeit minimal, were noticeable - and that was a £130 bd player going up to a £300 player (in today's money - we all know the Denon was way over priced because it was their first bd player). If that's the case, I would imagine that there is a small improvement as you go up the chain to the very top. No one is saying that the improvement has to be calculated by the cost difference - of course your brilliant Z7 is not going to sound only half as good as the £3000 Arcam. Similarly, a £4k bd player is not going to show 10 times better picture than a £400 player. However, saying that they are all look the same with a bluray spinning is hard to believe. I believe that to many the Oppo would be a better choice - a player that plays mkv?! That's great news for many but the 99% of others don't even know or care what .mkv is. My point though is the WHF review would not state that the Sony is a better bd player, if it wasn't.
Yes they're noticeable, but in terms of 1080p picture the price differences don't warrant the improvement. I've been buying hifi long enough to know that you don't get double the quality for double the price, but the Sony BDP-S350 was £200 when the 5 star DVD-2500BT was selling for £600. In my opinion no way did the Denon warrant the extra £400, especially when it spat out quite a few discs, yet it got 5 stars and I bought it (my fault I know for not testing). As for the Z7, it sounds better on my set up with movies and SACD, and as I've tweaked it's settings over the last few weeks and it's run in, it's not far off the AVR600's stereo performance. That's the Z7 is better with movies and SACD, dosen't lock-up, more features, better upscaling and not far off with stereo music. That's why I'm hesitating a bit with recent WHF reviews, £1500 extra just isn't worth it when it's worse in some areas and only slightly better in others.
I agree with you that minor improvements wouldn't make a hike in price seem worthwhile to me. However, there are plenty of others who just want the best picture they can afford. As for your receiver, that is a huge sum not to demo with your own speakers. It could well be that your speakers match the Yam more than the Arcam or that the Arcam is over priced.