Viao-2008 said:Thanks for your replys. What do you think would be a good amp to pair with them to get the most out of the speaker? the most i can spend would be £1200 and the amp would have to have a usb, bluetooth to connet my iphone
Viao-2008 said:Thanks for your replys. What do you think would be a good amp to pair with them to get the most out of the speaker? the most i can spend would be £1200 and the amp would have to have a usb, bluetooth to connet my iphone
manicm said:WHF didn't give the CM5 much cop. I think the 685 will be better value and more flexible too, if you're looking that way. Otherwise there are other speakers on Earth you know...
plastic penguin said:manicm said:WHF didn't give the CM5 much cop. I think the 685 will be better value and more flexible too, if you're looking that way. Otherwise there are other speakers on Earth you know...
Yes, but if the OP like the look...
Is there huge significance in WHFI giving them 3 stars? Isn't it more about system synergy?
chebby said:plastic penguin said:manicm said:WHF didn't give the CM5 much cop. I think the 685 will be better value and more flexible too, if you're looking that way. Otherwise there are other speakers on Earth you know...
Yes, but if the OP like the look...
Is there huge significance in WHFI giving them 3 stars? Isn't it more about system synergy?
4 stars actually.
plastic penguin said:If you look in the April 2013 edition the CM5s are in a Group Test with LS50s, Audiovector K1 Super, Mission SX2, Opera Mezza and Tannoy Precision 6.1. The CM5s have been reduced to 3 stars.
chebby said:plastic penguin said:If you look in the April 2013 edition the CM5s are in a Group Test with LS50s, Audiovector K1 Super, Mission SX2, Opera Mezza and Tannoy Precision 6.1. The CM5s have been reduced to 3 stars.
Yeah they must be c##p then.