On one make system I was wondering why Roksan was left out is it because Roksan didn't deliver equipments or WHS&V didn't consider it.
On Cyrus system the remark related to slight lack in treble weight, was it attrubuted to Kef Q300 speakers? what if it was replaced with something Dynaudion 160?
Second question on Dynaudio 160 review, I was surprised to see Roksan Caspian was recomended, my past experience on Roksan and Dynaudio has not been great. Generally Roksan has big soundstage with powerful bass which exponentiate Dyns hence sound is more bass and less enjoyable. Unless the M2 is different from outgoing M1.
Finally on Galaxy Nexus vs SII is it the Android version which knocked the star off SII or hardware difference?
On Cyrus system the remark related to slight lack in treble weight, was it attrubuted to Kef Q300 speakers? what if it was replaced with something Dynaudion 160?
Second question on Dynaudio 160 review, I was surprised to see Roksan Caspian was recomended, my past experience on Roksan and Dynaudio has not been great. Generally Roksan has big soundstage with powerful bass which exponentiate Dyns hence sound is more bass and less enjoyable. Unless the M2 is different from outgoing M1.
Finally on Galaxy Nexus vs SII is it the Android version which knocked the star off SII or hardware difference?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram