Al ears
Well-known member
Richard Allen said:Al ears said:Richard Allen said:matt49 said:Al ears said:And Neat also claim about £9000 .....
True. I'm sure Richard will be aiming rather lower in price, if not performance.
Ouch!!!. Thanks Matt!!. Lower in price yes. £4000ish. Lower in performance?. We'll see about that one. If I don't think it works then it won't see the light of day.
I don't think Matt meant it that way (at least I think not) *biggrin*
But it does beg to question how, if you have not actually built a pair of fully-functioning isobaric speakers, you can quote a price of £4000?
Do you build your speakers to a preconceived price.
Simple economics really Al. I start with the material cost of a pair, put my margin on to get them out of the door, add the dealers margin which I know, and then add VAT to give the suggested selling price.
These are not cheap cabinets to build. There's a lot goes into them in financial costs. True, they won't be the likes of the Neats but it gives you some idea as to how much the components that go into these things actually cost.
Got you Richard. Just wondered, because, say in the course of your experimentation you found a pair of transducers that provided better measurements but they cost 3 times the price of the ones you are currently employing, would you then go ahead and build a pair that might retail at say £6000 or would you stick with the £4000 configuration as they would ultimately be more 'saleable'?