keeper of the quays said:
Does the arcam dock amplify the signal to amp? Is your pioneer dac better than the arcam? Im assuming it is coz your using the pioneer dac..is yours a touch 4? Did you try thru mini to rca into pre amp? With eq off...is it a massive difference? With the arcam to pioneer..sorry for all the questions but im very interested as i use my ipod touch thru my hifi...one last question? How was arcam dac thru your kit?
The volume of the docked device can be altered if you are using the RCA output of the dock, so the dock does have a preamp section yes. However I feel that this isn't as good as just bypassing that altogether and feeding the digital signal to my Pioneer, it takes all unnecessary circuits out of the chain.
The Arcam drdock sounds incredibly good when using it's own DAC. It just sounds slightly duller than my Pioneer (I am talking slightly) but it's enough to be able to tell the difference and I prefer the sound of the Pioneer.
I am am using a 4th gen touch yes, previously I had it connected up with the Arcam irdock which doesn't bypass the iPods DAC, it's just a fancy pre amp for your device with RCA outputs. It was in my head that the drdock must be better because it bypasses all analogue sections of the iPod. So I bought the digital drdock. The reality was the drdock sounded no better than the irdock (both sound incredibly good). I experimented a little and concluded that the digital drdock connected to a digital input on my Pioneer CD-R sounded the best.
Given that my CD-R, my CD Player & my Blu Ray Player all sound the same with CD quality music I gather that they are all pretty accurate to the source material. Hence my conclusion that the CD-R DAC is better than the DAC/pre amp in the Arcam drdock, given that there is a subtle drop in top end clarity with the dock on it's own.
I've never tried the 3.5mm to RCA leads. My amp has a 3.5mm input jack for portables and I've never tried that either.
Hope my long winded post makes sence?
🙂