D
The SR250. Thinking about creating a 2 channel speaker setup.CnoEvil said:I take it your are asking about the SR250, rather than the much older AVR250?
What is your thinking behind looking at this?
Arcam works with many speakers, from Kef to PMC.
Separate system, just a 2 Channel one.Q5 said:Is this for a seperate system Gel, or are you dropping down to a 2 channel system.
gel said:The SR250. Thinking about creating a 2 channel speaker setup.
Would you recommend the Kef LS50’s? Or something different? Cheers
The system becomes complicated that way. Not sure gel will prefer that.CnoEvil said:If your AV amp dies, you can combine decent 2 channel, with AV, either by going for an Arcam Class G AV amp, or get a much cheaper AV amp and use the Pre-Outs into a decent 2 Channel Amp with HT Bypass....it all depends on how much you value 2 Channel vs AV.
bigboss said:The system becomes complicated that way. Not sure gel will prefer that.CnoEvil said:If your AV amp dies, you can combine decent 2 channel, with AV, either by going for an Arcam Class G AV amp, or get a much cheaper AV amp and use the Pre-Outs into a decent 2 Channel Amp with HT Bypass....it all depends on how much you value 2 Channel vs AV.
CnoEvil said:The logic of various options can then be amicably teased out, which will hopefully result in a sensible course of action...
gel said:If I am replacing my Pioneer amp, I will consider the Arcam 850, the Pioneer sc-lx901 and the Denon amps. I keep hearing good things about the Arcam’s though.
Frank Harvey will lend me the Arcam. Richer Sounds the Pioneer sc-lx901. Not sure about Denon’s To be honest.CnoEvil said:gel said:If I am replacing my Pioneer amp, I will consider the Arcam 850, the Pioneer sc-lx901 and the Denon amps. I keep hearing good things about the Arcam’s though.
IMO. With the Arcam, you won't need a separate 2 Channel Amp...though it would be worth comparing to BB's suggestion as well, in case it covers your bases, for less money.
gel said:Is Arcam releasing any new amps this year? Thanks.
gel said:Frank Harvey will lend me the Arcam. Richer Sounds the Pioneer sc-lx901. Not sure about Denon’s To be honest.CnoEvil said:gel said:If I am replacing my Pioneer amp, I will consider the Arcam 850, the Pioneer sc-lx901 and the Denon amps. I keep hearing good things about the Arcam’s though.
IMO. With the Arcam, you won't need a separate 2 Channel Amp...though it would be worth comparing to BB's suggestion as well, in case it covers your bases, for less money.
bigboss said:Pioneer SC-LX502 has more watts per channel than the 901. Most expensive in the range does not necessarily mean best in the range. Avoid 11 channel amps if you don't need so many channels as compromises are made to accommodate 11 channels.
Can you explain other reasons? When you squeeze 11 channels of amplification in one box, compromises are made. If you buy an amp with less channels for similar money, you're buying better components. Gel does not need so many channels. He has a 5.1 system. Effectively, he's paying for 6 extra channels he does not need.buzz_lightclick said:bigboss said:Pioneer SC-LX502 has more watts per channel than the 901. Most expensive in the range does not necessarily mean best in the range. Avoid 11 channel amps if you don't need so many channels as compromises are made to accommodate 11 channels.
More watts doesn’t necessarily mean the amp is better! The 502 is the entry level in the SC-LX range.
The 901 is the top of the line, not just because it offers the most channels
Thats very interesting BB. I think I am going a bit crazy with my budget now. I will probably home demo the Denon 6400 first then.bigboss said:Can you explain other reasons? When you squeeze 11 channels of amplification in one box, compromises are made. If you buy an amp with less channels for similar money, you're buying better components. Gel does not need so many channels. He has a 5.1 system. Effectively, he's paying for 6 extra channels he does not need.buzz_lightclick said:bigboss said:Pioneer SC-LX502 has more watts per channel than the 901. Most expensive in the range does not necessarily mean best in the range. Avoid 11 channel amps if you don't need so many channels as compromises are made to accommodate 11 channels.
More watts doesn’t necessarily mean the amp is better! The 502 is the entry level in the SC-LX range.
The 901 is the top of the line, not just because it offers the most channels
The 502 is just an example of how the same manufacturer could not put a more powerful amplifier in its flagship model to even match the output of the entry level model.