cse said:
manicm said:
chebby said:
I would still like to see a manufacturer have the courage to go against 'fashion' and flip the width / depth proportions so that the cabinet has a wider front baffle and less front-to-back depth. These were the 'classic' proportions until relatively recently. I am convinced a wider front baffle used to give better stereo imaging.
Thanks for the review Major. (And for introducing a new test criteria.)
...and easier positioning as well. I too would like to see this revert.
Neat Petit SX?
I can see what you mean ...
... their proportions look a lot more pleasing than some of their peers (to me at least).
(Almost the same proportions as my 1991 vintage JPW Sonatas.)
Although they are rear ported, so will still need more clearance than an infinite baffle cabinet.
Manicm's desire for "easier positioning" is not reflected in Neat's advice on the matter. (A starting point of 12" from the wall and 24" from corners and 20 degrees toe-in is suggested before individual 'experimentation'.)