Clearer Audio Copper line alpha one

[QuestForThe13thNote]

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/taking-action-about-discrimination/taking-action-about-harassment/

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

I am holding you to account. You still have not responded to the accusations made Andrew which directly challenge his honesty.

i asked you to stop twice but you have carried on. One last time, before I will report this to the police. Please confirm you agree to stop.

 

[Gaz37]

Although harassment is not specifically defined in section 7(2) of the PHA, it can include repeated attempts to impose unwanted communications and contact upon a victim in a manner that could be expected to cause distress or fear in any reasonable person.

Nobody is imposing anything on you, you are reading these posts of your volition.

If you don't like it do everybody a favour & don't come on here again

 

[nick8858]

I would reckon the amount of disparaging comments you have made about me would be more than enough to rebuff any case you (think) you have. You are equally harrasing and abusive and willingly engage in putting down others and even accusing them of being dishonest as well.

 

[jmjones]

First witness for the defence here.

 

[jimmy1]

Put the cables down and back away slowly

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

Harassment is very clearly defined as two or more occasions, and it’s very broad. It’s has a civil and criminal remedy. And a defence to harassment isn’t the fault of the person suffering it. No volenti non fit injuria.

If your view is you come online to be possibly trolled and if you don’t like it go, very much flies in the face of the law. I’d suggest have a think about that.

 

[nick8858]

Looking at the amounts of insults you have posted I reckon you are a serial offender. As well as questionin a members honesty. You STILL have not responded to that in any satisfactory way whatsoever

 

[jmjones]

You seem to know a lot about online harassment Quest. Does it happen to you a lot?

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

I’ve worked in the legal / liability field.

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

Looking at the amounts of insults you have posted I reckon you are a serial offender. As well as questionin a members honesty. You STILL have not responded to that in any satisfactory way whatsoever

ive given you a third opportunity to stop so am now reporting you to the police.

 

[daveh75]

You seem to know a lot about online harassment Quest. Does it happen to you a lot?

Only in his mind. He's a professional victim!

 

[jmjones]

What as?

 

[Gaz37]

I’ve worked in the legal / liability field. 

And you're talking rubbish

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

If you don’t all stop I will add your names into the ring with police.

 

[nick8858]

Funnily enough...

 

[QuestForThe13thNote]

Harassment is very clearly defined as two or more occasions, and it’s very broad. It’s has a civil and criminal remedy. And a defence to harassment isn’t the fault of the person suffering it. No volenti non fit injuria.

If your view is you come online to be possibly trolled and if you don’t like it go, very much flies in the face of the law. I’d suggest have a think about that.

Libel is also clearly defined in UK law in the Defamation act 2013. If Ellis can prove what you say about him is untrue & has damaged his reputation you could be liable

you need deep pockets to sue for libel and slander, it’s not legal aid funded, and it typically is done by rich or on a pro bono basis, and anyway ellis and I get on fine thanks,and neither of us has slandered each other. We have been chatting on email all afternoon.

 

[Gaz37]

Harassment is very clearly defined as two or more occasions, and it’s very broad. It’s has a civil and criminal remedy. And a defence to harassment isn’t the fault of the person suffering it. No volenti non fit injuria. 

If your view is you come online to be possibly trolled and if you don’t like it go, very much flies in the face of the law. I’d suggest have a think about that. 

Libel is also clearly defined in UK law in the Defamation act 2013.
If Andrew can prove what you say about him is untrue & has damaged his reputation you could be liable

 

[daveh75]

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/taking-action-about-discrimination/taking-action-about-harassment/

Works both ways.

Again take a look at your own behaviour, you've been harassing an entire community of people since you first arrived (and it's not the first community you've done it to either is it?), and many have simply grown sick of it and taking things into their own hands because of complete lack of care from WHF about what goes on on their forum...

The threats of action and emotional blackmail just don't wash, we've seen it all before from you...

 

[Gaz37]

Harassment is very clearly defined as two or more occasions, and it’s very broad. It’s has a civil and criminal remedy. And a defence to harassment isn’t the fault of the person suffering it. No volenti non fit injuria. 

If your view is you come online to be possibly trolled and if you don’t like it go, very much flies in the face of the law. I’d suggest have a think about that. 

Libel is also clearly defined in UK law in the Defamation act 2013. If Ellis can prove what you say about him is untrue & has damaged his reputation you could be liable

 

you need deep pockets to sue for libel and slander, it’s not legal aid funded, and it typically is done by rich or on a pro bono basis, and anyway ellis and I get on fine thanks,and neither of us has slandered each other. We have been chatting on email all afternoon.

I meant Andrew

 

[Gaz37]

If you don’t all stop I will add your names into the ring with police. 

Let me know which station you're going to so I can watch them laugh at you

 

[jimmy1]

I wonder what power lead they use on the tape deck in the police interview room *biggrin*

 

[nick8858]

Harassment is very clearly defined as two or more occasions, and it’s very broad. It’s has a civil and criminal remedy. And a defence to harassment isn’t the fault of the person suffering it. No volenti non fit injuria.

If your view is you come online to be possibly trolled and if you don’t like it go, very much flies in the face of the law. I’d suggest have a think about that.

Libel is also clearly defined in UK law in the Defamation act 2013. If Ellis can prove what you say about him is untrue & has damaged his reputation you could be liable

you need deep pockets to sue for libel and slander, it’s not legal aid funded, and it typically is done by rich or on a pro bono basis, and anyway ellis and I get on fine thanks,and neither of us has slandered each other. We have been chatting on email all afternoon.

I meant Andrew

Yes I agree its Andrew that is the vistim of a dubious accusation here and still amazingly NO response

 

[Gaz37]

I wonder what power lead they use on the tape deck in the police interview room *biggrin*

They don't use tapes anymore, all digital now

 

[nick8858]

FLAC or MP3?