In the consumer space in general, increased demands on incomes as well as increases in the standard of living we expect means the amount we are prepared to spend on items in real terms is lower. This means they have to be cheaper, some of this is met by economies of scale, some by accelerated development process, a cheaper part, a cheaper workforce, better technology, better processes etc. Some of these might mean the product is somehow of lesser quality than you had encountered before, but you would probably need to be selective as to which examples you chose to prove your point. Would you trade your 2014 car that will happily do 120k+ miles for a brand new example from the 80's, I doubt it. Others look back at that massive hulk of a CRT TV they used to own and reminisce as to the fact it lasted 20years, conveniently forgetting that a good TV was a very expensive item built using boring and stable technology. It was so expensive you rented it, todays TV can cost less than a weekend away, and the manufacturer doesn't want it to last 20 years because they didn't make very much money selling it to you in the first place.
But this is a HiFi forum, specifically one populated by people who spend staggering sums of money on what they quite reasonably expect to be quality merchandise. But there is a problem, even HiFi has to move forwards, there are new techologies to implement and expections to meet that can no longer simply be met by electronic wizardy. This is where software steps in, it provides the logic that would otherwise require huge and complicated circuits, it runs your displays, decodes your audio streams, tunes your phase lock loops and runs to 100's or even millions of lines. There is no such thing as a piece of software of any size that is 100% bug free, you can test for every conceivable user or system interaction but there will always be things that are missed or not thought o fand so will not be found in testing. Sometimes these bugs, won't be bugs at all, instead they are features or approaches that do not agree with how the user wishes to use the product. This is why you will find a continuous evolution of these softwares and why many modern products are capable of being updated in the field or even automatically. There is far less room for any excuses for failures at a hardware level, when systems cost as much as many of these do there is no need or reason to cut corners on the quality of parts, they are not the significant cost, R&D, QA and labour are.
I would argue that all discussions in open forums are good and healthy, small software bugs and glitches can go unnoticed or unreported for years. If the software engineer doesn't know they are there, they cannot get fixed. If someone pops on a forum and says "This is a bit odd... does anyone else find xxx?" , that can mean the difference between a fault being identified and fixed versus the issue being ignored as a one off glitch. It is always worth remembering that the internet means we have far greater access to reports of these issues and people can tend to report the bad more often than the good. I don't think thats the case here, you are far more likely to see positive comments than negative ones, if as a product manufacturer you start seeing more of the bad, a proactive approach to solving the public examples cannot be anything other than good publicity. A combative one can only be bad, you won't find many customers who accept they are wrong, least of all ones who are concerned about their expensive kit. It is also worth remembering that increased sales will mean increased faulty units, googling would suggest Rega has done quite well of late....
A company can indeed use bankruptcy as a means to escape debts, just as we can with an IVA. It would be wrong to conisder this some kind of get out of jail free card. Employees, and suppliers will have gotten hurt, those bridges may be burnt, a whole new relationship will need to be built for anything new to come into being. I guess we have to wait and see...